|
"Greater things are believed of those who are absent."
-Tacitus |
Aboot Reader's Rep Home RSS Feed POSTS BY TOPIC 2010 Election Baseball Beer Beer of the Week Books Business Culture Drinking Economics Football Global Warming Health Care Hockey (02-05) Hockey (06-07) Hockey (08-09) Media-Local (02-04) Media-Local (05-07) Media-Local (08-09) Media National (02-06) Media National (07-09) Media National (10-11) Movies Music NARN (04-05) NARN (06-07) NARN (08-09) NARN (10-11) Politics-Local (02-03) Politics-Local (04-05) Politics-Local (06-07) Politics-Local (08-09) Politics-National (02-04) Politics-National (05-07) Politics-National (08-10) Ralphie Religion Separated At Birth? Television Terrorism Travel CHAD THE ELDER: rightwinger23 at hotmail.com Twitter SAINT PAUL: saintp at excite.com JB DOUBTLESS: abunodisceomnes at hotmail.com ATOMIZER: atomizer77 at yahoo.com SISYPHUS: NIHILIST IN GOLF PANTS: NihilistPaul at yahoo.com Twitter THE CRAZY UKE: karkoc5 at earthlink.net FEATURES Beer Ratings
Recommended Reading Fraters At The Fair Hugh Hugs A Tree Separated At Birth? Travels With Ralphie ATOMIZER's A-LIST JB's SACK SITES SAINT PAUL'S SHOW STOPPERS ELDER's ELITE THE USUAL SUSPECTS IN AGGREGATE CENTER OF GRAVITY INVISIBLE AIRWAVES |
Sunday, July 31, 2005
I'm A Luva Of The Fightas
The Sports Guys gives us his Idiots Guide to the NHL Lockout: Q: What's the second-worst part of the deal? As the owner of eight hockey fight tapes from the '70s and '80s, as well as someone who still regards Stan Jonathan's beating of Pierre Bouchard as the highlight of my childhood, I was outraged with the new fighting rules. Not only will anyone who instigates a fight in the final five minutes of a game receive a game misconduct and automatic one-game suspension, the length of the suspension doubles for each additional incident. Basically, they're imploring us to turn the channel with five minutes left if either team is up by three goals. The NHL has turned on the bat signal -- we need Vince. (It's almost like they're openly taunting Vince McMahon to start the XHL at this point. I know I've written this a million times, but if the XHL goes head-to-head against the NHL on Tuesday nights -- well, which league would you watch? I know where I would be.) Saturday, July 30, 2005
In January of 2003 I had a chance to watch then fifteen year old Sydney Crosby play hockey and I opined:
Perhaps even more impressive than his five points were a couple of passes he made, including a back-handed cross-ice saucer pass that had NHL written all over it. Remember this kid's name. You might be hearing it a lot in the future. Two and half years later, guess who was the #1 pick in today's NHL draft? As expected, the Pittsburgh Penguins selected Crosby first overall in the 2005 NHL entry draft Saturday afternoon in Ottawa. Crosby, who turns 18 on Aug. 7, is the most anticipated hockey prospect in years. The prodigious forward was a star with the Rimouski Oceanic of the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League during the past two seasons. One other draft note: two Minnesota kids were taken in the first round today (three if you count Brian Lee who hails from Fargo and played at Moorhead). Anyone want to guess how many Colorado natives went that early? Labels: Hockey (02-05)
Everything I Needed To Know I Learned From The Elder
Lori e-mails: Thank you, Elder. As soon as I read your entertaining disclosure, I printed it(minus a few colorful sentences) for my 17 year old daughter. She thought it was a hoot and we had a good talk about weed, paranoia, motivation, and economics. But I did have to explain that the Elder was actually this twenty-something blogger [Note: Actually thirty-something blogger]. (Us older people are clueless.) Thank you for providing me with a teachable moment and with our pop culture these days, there's a lot to be covered. Congratulations to you and your wife and also, congratulations on the success of the Northern Alliance Radio. I learn so much from new media.
Regarding the hardships suffered by Knight Ridder reporter Hannah Allam during her reporting tour of duty in Iraq (lack of a good manicurist, unreliable karaoke service), Sisyphus (at Nihilist in Golfpant) has stepped up to create a new charity seeking to address these particular needs. His mission statement:
Unfortunately, no one seems to care about another group that is forced to live under conditions every bit as difficult: the journalists tasked with undermining our mission in Iraq. Don't miss his Top 11 Items most in need of donation, including... 11. Decent non-fat soy lattes 10. Gift certificates for a day of beauty at the Spalon Montage in the Baghdad Green Zone. 9. Kerry/Edwards bumper stickers (so the insurgents will know not to target reporter?s vehicles) 8. The e-mail addresses of anti-war members of the military in Iraq. 4. Karaoke machines. Remember folks, give 'til it hurts. They won't come back if they can karaoke over there. Labels: Media-Local (05-07)
Yesterday's News
On the Hugh Hewitt program yesterday, Hugh discussed his new policy for conducting interviews with mainstream media outlets. The reporters must agree to do them LIVE! on air. Hugh's philosophy: I of course want my listeners to get a chance if not to see the sausage that is MSM "news" being made, at least hear it being ground fine. I had hoped to compare whatever I was able to provide [Washington Post reporter] Ms. Goldstein with whatever it is that she publishes on the subject. Interesting all around, no? But she declined to conduct the interview she requested. How interesting to note that the Post is willing to use sources that insist on anonymity, but not sources that demand transparency. It's a fine idea by Hugh and it's too bad he found no takers for his offer. Of course, Hugh's idea isn't exactly original. In fact, the idea of fulfilling print media requests over the radio airwaves may have been birthed right here in the Twin Cities. By none other than your pals at Fraters Libertas. You may recall from this past January this promo for the Northern Alliance Radio Network: Hour 3: The epic meeting of the medias on the battleground of the public airwaves and in the public consciousness. Yes, its MSM standard bearer Mark Yost of the Pioneer Press spending an hour in the wolves' lair of blogging and talk radio. And we're thrilled to announce that this will be an historic occasion. For the first time in the long, august history of journalism, an intrepid editorialist will be practicing his craft LIVE ON THE AIR!!! Yes, Mark is interested in finding out more about this whole blogging phenomena and he wants to interview the Fraters Libertas and the rest of the NARN crew for an article to appear in the pages of the Pioneer Press. And it will all be happening LIVE ON THE AIR!!!! And it did turn out to be just as exciting and ground breaking as those exclamation points and ALL CAPS predicted. (The results of Mark's interview were discussed here.) Let's hope someday Hugh Hewitt gets an interview request from a journalist with as much integrity as Mark Yost so he can experience what it's like to be interviewed on air. And let's hope John Hinderaker from Power Line is listening. He seems enamored by the idea and hails Hewitt as "brilliant" for conceiving it. I'm sure he would have described us similarly, if only he listened to the Northern Alliance Radio Network. For his future reference it is on 12 - 3 PM, Saturdays on AM1280 the Patriot. Friday, July 29, 2005
See Her in the Funny Papers
The plight of Knight Ridder reporter Hannah Allam, featured in today's Day By Day. In this cartoon, Chris Muir points out another of Allam's reasons for leaving Iraq (as quoted in Editor and Publisher). "When I first started, there was a real collegial press corp," she explained. "We knew Iraq was dangerous, but not for us. In the old days, we could travel, the coverage could be comprehensive and complete and you could have a life. Go out to karaoke at night or to parties." But, in the past few months, Allam said the atmosphere had dramatically changed for journalists. "It suddenly came that you couldn't travel," she said. "You begin to wonder if you can give your readers a full picture. It is extremely difficult and not as much fun." So ... she's outta there. Her speculation on not giving a full picture kind of proves Yost's original point about how the mainstream media isn't reporting the whole story about what is happening in Iraq. Ironically, it was Yost's comments which caused her to lash out with her ridiculous accusations about the US military being too sheltered from the truth about what is really happening in Iraq to accurately speak about it. Accusations which now seem like a classic case of projection: "the operation of expelling feelings or wishes the individual finds wholly unacceptable - too shameful, too obscene, too dangerous - by attributing them to another."
Summertime And The Livin' Is Ghetto
From this morning's WSJ Tony and Tacky column: GHETTO BLASTERS: When adults try to be hip and reach out to today's youth, they often miss the mark. That's what happened after Miami authorities announced a "Ghetto Style Talent Show" and a watermelon-eating contest as part of a summer-camp picnic today for city children. After critics complained about stereotyping, Parks Director Ernest Burkeen (ed note: who is black) apologized Monday and the talent-show name was changed to "Funky." Although the watermelon-eating contest was not canceled, Florida International University professor and race-relations expert Marvin Dunn called it an "insult to black history and black pride." In fact, he told Tuesday's Miami Herald: "If I eat a piece of watermelon, I do it inside."
Hey Jesse, Now Jerome
Today's nominee in the category of unfortunate historical allusions is the good Reverend Jackson. From the Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire: UNDERCOUNT: Complaining he was barred from testifying, Jesse Jackson blasts an all-white "apartheid panel" at Senate hearing on whether a new Nielsen television-ratings system undercounts minorities. The ex-presidential candidate supports the new Nielsen rating and wanted to express opposition to legislation backed by News Corp. that could have forced changes. A spokesman for Sen. Burns of Montana said Jackson wasn't invited because he's "not an expert."
The Rest of the Story
Just back from a Southern California jaunt and a fine trip it was. No souvenirs except the Santa Monica beach 3rd degree sunburns over 80% of my body. Thank goodness my Speedo was at the cleaner's and I wore regular trunks, or it would have been over 95% of my body. I'll leave the body mass index calculation implications of that to you. Anywho .... picking up on a blog post I abandoned before my trip ... A couple of weeks ago, while documenting the self righteous outrage among the press regarding Mark Yost's criticism of their efforts and accuracy in reporting on the war in Iraq, we highlighted the remarks of Knight Ridder Baghdad bureau chief Hannah Allam. Specifically, it was her denigrating of the efforts of US troops, characterizing them as pampered and ignorant of the truth. This excerpt was taken from the bulletin board style "Forum" section of Poynter Online: Mr. Yost could have come with me today as I visited one of my own military buddies, who like most officers doesn't leave the protected Green Zone compound except by helicopter or massive convoy. The Army official picked me up in his air-conditioned Explorer, took me to Burger King for lunch and showed me photos of the family he misses so terribly. The official is a great guy, and like so many other soldiers, it's not politics that blind him from seeing the real Iraq. The compound's maze of tall blast wall and miles of concertina wire obscure the view, too. The history of propaganda teaches that if you don't publicly challenge false assertions, no matter how absurd they are, they will be widely disseminated by outlets that have few standards for ethics or accuracy. And before you know it, it becomes the conventional wisdom. Unfortunately, that process appears to be well underway. In an unsigned editorial last week, the Star Tribune begins the process of wide dissemination of the notion that US soldiers in Iraq do not have adequate basis to testify about the success of our efforts there, because they are sheltered from the truth : Bloodshed and chaos dominate reporting from the country because that is the reality which journalists risk their lives daily to chronicle. The optimists tend to be soldiers and civilian officials corralled inside the heavily fortified "green zone" in the center of Baghdad. One Knight-Ridder reporter recently described the problem. When she went to lunch with a friend in the military, he "picked me up in his air-conditioned Explorer, took me to Burger King for lunch and showed me photos of the family he misses so terribly." It's "not politics that blind him from seeing the real Iraq," she said. "The [Green Zone's] maze of tall blast walls and miles of concertina wire obscure the view, too." That paper's use of this recycled quote is made even more despicable by the fact they don't even bother to provide a citation for who the reporter was or the context the remarks were made in, so the reader can properly judge their validity. But there it is. Now festering in more minds, adding to the theory that US soldiers in Iraq are not people we should be trusting to provide information about what is exactly happening in Iraq. Instead, they insist you trust the heroic members of the press corps. And what kind of info are you getting from them? A brief survey of the opening paragraphs from Hannah Allam's reporting of late: July 14: The Iraqi Defense Ministry has squandered more than $300 million buying faulty and outdated military equipment in what appears to be a massive web of corruption that flourished under American-appointed supervisors for a year or longer, U.S. and Iraqi military officials said this week. July 10: Suicide bombers struck throughout Iraq on Sunday, killing at least 38 people and wounding dozens in a series of attacks aimed mainly at the country's overwhelmed and vulnerable security forces. July 7: The group al-Qaida in Iraq announced Thursday that it had killed Egypt's top envoy to Baghdad. The statement accompanied a chilling video of the diplomat blindfolded and under insurgent interrogation. June 11: Ten Sunni Muslim tribesmen died after You starting to pick up a bit of a plot line here? The implacable and daring insurgents, the overwhelmed and vulnerable and frightened security forces, all fighting under the cover of corrupt and incompetent American supervision. A tidy little tale, one that, if accepted, might lead to the eroding of public support for the war, a withdrawal of American troops, and ultimately dire political consequences for the Bush administration. With stakes this high, one can see why so many reporters are true believers of the story. And why they are so desperate to shout down those voices (Yost, the US troops) trying to tell the other side of the story. BTW, I hope you enjoyed Hannah Allam's war reporting while you could. She's had enough and is packing up shop and moving to Cairo. She claims reporting in Iraq is too dangerous and "not fun" any more. I didn't know those were prerequisites for news reporting, but it's good to finally have Ms. Allam's priorities exposed to the light of day. Here's another glimpse into the priorities of Knight Ridder's bureau chief, from NPR's On the Media: BROOKE GLADSTONE: You had described this, this remarkable incident at the American Society of Newspaper Editors convention last week. What was that story? HANNAH ALLAM: There was a salon in Baghdad where I used to go after stressful days to get a manicure or just to relax, and it was run by two really funny Iraqi women. And we've become friends in the past two years. And I was in there three weeks to a month ago, and my cell phone rang, and instinctively I just picked it up and said hello - in English. And there was just this silence that fell over the room. People stared at me, and I realized what I had done. And then my friend, the Iraqi owner of the salon, came over and said - you know, it breaks my heart, I'm sorry to tell you this, but you put yourself in danger. You've put us in danger. Now they know that you're a foreigner - the other customers, and it's not safe for you to come here any more. That was the, the last refuge for me, and now it's gone as well. As Sherman once said, war is hell ... on your finger nails. Lord knows how hard it can be to find a good manicurist in a war zone. We wish her better luck in finding a salon that meets her standards in Cairo.
Scofflaw Dad (or A Good Walk Spoiled)
Thanks to all those who e-mailed or posted with congratulations on the addition to our family. We're adjusting to life with baby and he's adjusting to us. So far, so good. I'm not going to go all kid-blogging crazy on you, but here are a couple of observations from a newbie parent: - It's amazing what you can do with just one free hand (keep your mind out of the gutter Foot): making coffee, laundry, dishes, eating, reading, typing, etc. Although, I have not quite mastered the CTRL-ALT-DELETE maneuver required to log in to my lap top. - Without getting into all the gory diaper changing details, let's just say that although the squirt gun is small, the range is impressive. Anyway I really appreciate the kind words, speculation about Nathaniel's blogging career, and advice on parenting that I've received so far. Like this e-mail from Barbara (better known as Girl in Right): Congrats on Nat the Junior!! There's nothing better than a little one who looks at the world with wide eyed enthusiasm. And hey, if writing about "Blake" and his drug issues makes you feel better, well you just go right ahead and keep writing. I'm sure you never wanted to be on the Supreme Court, anyway. Or President. Of Nathaniel's Boy Scout Troop. Sigh. So much potential. Poor Nat. Gee thanks. Barbara's not the only one urging discretion. Sandy from the MAWB Squad has a list of new parenting advice including: Disclosure: You might want to rethink public disclosure like this. There's no benefit to your child to know the complete truth about their parents youthful indiscretions until much, much later in life. Sage advice indeed. But since I think I have a little time until Nathaniel is reading this blog (twelve to fourteen months I figure), I might as well take the opportunity to air a little more dirty laundry. In fact, just yesterday I had a run in with an officer of the law. My crime? Walking. Yes, I was issued a citation for walking. Okay, it was just a warning, but still...walking? It was a beautiful summer day here in the Twin Cities and I elected to take advantage of it by squeezing in a brisk constitutional. My wife and I usually walk every day, but she's still a little worn out from that whole giving birth thing and so I was solo. I needed to pick up photo paper and a new printer ink cartridge, so I decided to walk to a nearby Office Max. Part of my planned route would take me down a regional bike trail. When I reached the entry point to the trail, I found it blocked off with yellow police tape and a sign advising that the paved trail would be closed for repairs for two days. Oh well, I figured, I'm not biking or blading so it shouldn't be a problem for me. I proceeded down the trail. I noticed a couple of roller bladers who did the same. I soon reached a second police tape barrier indicating that the trail was closed. I blew past it as well, rounded a corner in the trail, and saw the roller bladers stopped by yet another construction sign and some sort of peace officer who appeared to be writing them a ticket. Now at this point, I could have turned tail and easily escaped notice. But I was curious to see what was going and sure that I wasn't doing anything wrong so I plowed ahead. The officer in question worked for the Three Rivers Park District (formerly Hennepin Parks). He greeted me brusquely and asked what I thought I was doing. Walking, I replied. "What part of 'trail closed' don't you understand?" I attempted to explain that since I was on foot I assumed that I could get around any construction related closure. He wasn't buying it. "You have valid ID on you?" I handed him my drivers license. He continued to write out citations to the two roller blading ruffians. At this point, I thought that I might be getting a ticket. A freakin' ticket for walking down a closed trail? I was silently steaming and preparing my defense strategy. No holds would be barred. Every possible angle would be argued. When he explained to the bladers that they were being issued warnings, I breathed a bit easier. But I was still I little peeved that I had to sit there and stew while he scribbled out my citation. Was it really necessary to go through the motions? Hadn't I already learned to respect the power and authority of the mighty Three Rivers Park District? Was this warning going on my permanent record? I quietly pocketed my warning and continued on my journey, having to employ a detour on local railroad tracks in order to reach my destination. The rest of the trip went off without incident. When I arrived home I explained my encounter with the law to my wife. "What did you get in trouble for?" "Well, you see I was just walking..." Thursday, July 28, 2005
Deep In Indian Country
Our friend Gary Larson is back at it again, this time with an article at Intellectual Conservative titled The 'Untouchables': Wealthy Tribal Casino Interests: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act intended to improve the lot of impoverished Indians on reservations. Instead it created a new, superrich class of savvy capitalist Indians.
Um guys, nobody is saluting
The folks at MoveOn.org are flogging the deceased Rove pony for all its worth, as evidenced by the latest e-mail plea: It's been almost a week since we all started writing letters-to-the-editor about the Karl Rove CIA-leak scandal. So far a whopping 34,928 letters have been written by MoveOn members. No mention of how many of these cut and paste specials ever saw the light of day at respectable newspapers (which of course excludes the Strib). That's a new record for us. The media is beginning to report on Rove again, but we need to create some buzz--the sort of public outrage you can see when you're walking down the street. "Dad, what are those freaks over there doing?" "That son? Why that's public outrage." That's why we want to create a downloadable poster that you can print out and hang up in your office, home, locker, car and wherever else seems right. Yes, because bringing your ultra left wing politics into the workplace is perfectly appropriate. But here's the thing: we aren't quite sure about the right slogan to write on the poster. Somebody suggested just putting up, "Fire Karl Rove." Another favorite was, "Fire the Liars." Witty zingers both. Can you feel the buzz?
Over, Under, Sideways, Down
I finally got around to renting the much-ballyhooed movie Sideways a few days back. I usually avoid almost everything coming out of Hollywood for many reasons (not the least of which is the plain fact that they hate me and everything I stand for) but mainly because most of the movies just plain stink. Shockingly enough, this one actually lived up to the considerable hype and I found the tale of two approaching-middle-age dudes (Paul Giamatti as Miles, a depressed school teacher and his randy pal Jack played by Thomas Haden Church) who go to the wine country for some male bonding before Jack gets married to be funny, poignant and original. But that apparently was not enough for the director of this movie, Alexander Payne. Entertaining his audience, hitting the right emotional notes about marriage/love/depression/getting older, creating beautiful shots of California wine country--all that was not enough for the guy. He had to take gratuitous shots at Christianity and the President. The shot at Bush (if you know the context, you'll forgive me for the construction of this sentence) came after Miles had to dash into a bedroom to retrieve Jack's wallet where a trashy couple was having bizarre sex with the President and Vice President on the TV in the background. It was no accident that the camera lingered on the TV so we could all have a good laugh at the not-so-subtle trash by association point that was being made. You see, to Hollywood, Republicans are hicks who apparently keep very messy houses and have perverted sex. The poke at Christianity comes in the deleted scenes. When the two guys get to the hotel, Jack takes a shower and Miles is bored. He looks around the room and then opens the drawer in the bedstand to find Gideon's bible. Taking it and rolling his eyes contemptuously, he throws the bible into the trash. He threw the bible in the garbage. Subtle, no? Here was a guy in his mid-forties, divorced, suffering from depression, working a dead-end job with silly, unrealistic dreams of being a "writer" who lived in a crappy one bedroom apartment and had no direction in life whatsoever who was saying "I don't need THAT!" I wanted to say "Listen man, you're a total loser. Nothing has worked out for you doing things the secular humanist way. Perhaps the things you would read about in that book in the trash would help you get your life together." Christianity is exactly what a putz like Miles needed to get his life back on track. But to director Payne, it was an opportunity to literally trash Christians in an extremely juvenile and hateful way. Regardless of how much I liked the movie, when it was over I was asking myself why I keep signing up this abuse and keep giving money to people that hate me.
Speak Softly And...
...keep a big stick handy: A hockey player all his life, Jeff Taylor wasn't about to fall back on defense against a three-person advantage Wednesday, especially at home. Moments earlier, he had been roused from his sleep by pounding on his door. Two men, backed by two women, pushed their way in, punched him and shoved him to the floor of his Fargo apartment at 1412 3rd Ave. N., Taylor said. A closed fist to Taylor's jaw knocked loose his dentures, enraging the 36-year-old enough that he shook off two of the intruders. "That kind of gave me the force of God," he said. "I just got my teeth. When they knocked them out I thought they broke them." Taylor, who lives alone, said three of the intruders ran. He held down the remaining man until two returned and kicked in his front door. The man under Taylor struggled free and locked himself in a bedroom. Inside the room, he pulled an air conditioner unit from the window to escape. That's when Taylor armed himself. He grabbed a hockey stick and ran behind the blue two-level house, where the getaway car idled in the alley. "As they were driving away I smashed out their back window," Taylor said. The blade on his stick broke off. Taylor figures it must still be in the back seat of the car. Wednesday, July 27, 2005
A Tiny Sucking Sound
If the vote tallies being reported on C-SPAN are correct, it appears that CAFTA has passed. Economic sanity prevails in Congress. Barely.
Speaking of classic rock parodies, here's our latest effort.
Make Minnesota Alabama (Sung to the tune of Sweet Home Alabama by Lynyrd Skynyrd) Wing nuts keep on turnin' Our noise machine creates a din Bloggers want to make Minnesota Into Alabamy on a whim And I think it's a win, yes Well, I heard City Pages whine about 'em Well, I heard the Strib put 'em down Well, I hope these rags will remember New media man don't need 'em around anyhow Make Minnesota Alabama Where the taxes are so few Make Minnesota Alabama We don't care 'bout burnin schools In St. Paul we praised the governor And it's true we raised a few Slashing budgets does not bother me Long as Tim provides the brew Funny 'cause it's true! Make Minnesota Alabama Where the taxes are so few Make Minnesota Alabama Shut up granny, eat your dog food! Now Stillwater has got the convicts Boo, boo, boo And they can clean the highways too Unions workers makin' way too much To be pickin' up after me and you Tell the truth Make Minnesota Alabama Where the taxes are so few Make Minnesota Alabama Ain't willing to pay for a better you Labels: Music Tuesday, July 26, 2005
It's Nearly A Laugh...But It's Really A Cry
I received a very interesting e-mail from a friend this afternoon. It's a chilling tale of intrigue and suspense. So chilling, my friends, that I must relate it to you now. Only the names of those involved have been changed (to current cast members of MTV's The Real World: Austin, mind you) to protect the...ummm...innocent: My friend Dr. Wes found a laptop on the street in the Cedar/42nd Ave. area of Mpls. He couldn't get past the passwords, so he gave it to me so I could try via XP startup disks. The battery was dead, so I gave it to my coworker Melinda, whose boyfriend Danny is a computer geek. He got into it last night, and discovered that it's owned by the Department of Defense! He quickly shut it off, and called the DOD. They told him to bring it to the nearest FBI office, which he did this morning. The FBI told him they didn't want it, and that he should "mail it to the Pentagon".I don't know which part of this story disturbs me most. It could be the fact that there was a laptop owned by someone at the DOD just lying on the streets of Minneapolis. It could be that a foreign born computer geek was easliy able to gain access to the encoded files on said laptop. It could be that the DOD doesn't seem real concerned about the whereabouts of a laptop that could very likely contain some classified material. It could be that, despite the whole Zacarias Moussaoui saga that played out here a few years ago, even the local FBI didn't seem to have the time to bother with investigating the matter. Disturbing revelations, all. I honestly believe, however, that the most frightening thing about all of this is the fact that in a few short hours, a misplaced Department of Defense laptop will be in the hands of my virulently anti-social and seldom sober friend Nehemiah. Be afraid, America. Be very afraid.
I'd Like To Thank The Nihilist Academy...
I'm truly sorry that I couldn't be present to accept my Rock Solid award in person but I was busy with those pesky chipmunks who have now taken up residence in my backyard shed. I'm all out of deadly gas bombs so I had to spend most of the day coming up with a creative way to rid myself of them for good. I ended up wiring the shed with cable TV so I could force the little bastards to watch the Twins roll over for the Yankees this evening. If that didn't kill them, nothing will.
Must See TV
I don't know how he pulled this off, but our old friend Greg Wallace (from What Attitude Problem?) will be appearing on the Daily Show with John Stewart tonight. He'll be discussing .... you guessed it ... the "gayification" of NASCAR. I have no idea what that means, but I predict at least one Dick Trickle joke. Knowing Greg as I do (which is barely), this has a chance to be hilarious. His email promotion for the show raises expectations further: There comes a time in one's life when we all do things we wish we regretted. This is one such time. To fully appreciate this, please tune into The Daily Show tonight on Comedy Central to see yours truly get his 15 seconds of fame/humiliation. I guess it was one of those things where I didn't want to wake up five years down the road and wonder what it would have been like if I had said no. They are doing a spot on the "gayification" of NASCAR (don't ask). They found me through my blog last January and finally got me up to Chicago a few weeks ago to shoot the spot. Fortunately, I have no children to whom I must explain this, just my two dogs. My sense is they will love me anyway. I don't watch television, so I'll simply have to see the clip when the show sends me a tape, which they've promised to do. Samantha Bee interviewed me and she was very nice off-camera. It's a game to them. We'll see. The good thing about this (I keep telling myself) is that our culture is so shallow and attention-deficit that the day after tomorrow no one will remember that it even happened. And of course no one at church will admit to even watching the show, so it's not as though my rep is totally trashed. Oh, I'm sure it will be fine. If not, it promises to be great TV. And thanks to the Internet, reviews of his performance will be around for centuries. It's one small humiliation for Greg, one giant leap backward for his entire line of descendents for generations. I can't wait. Catch it all on Comedy Central tonight! Monday, July 25, 2005
Book Burnin'
Blake e-mails with another tale of bakin' on the clock: I worked with a guy like Larry, only he was a fellow Librarian Assistant in the Fresno County Library in Fresno, CA. He had been a Religious Studies major at CSU Fresno, and now he was a professional info-hack. Although he always claimed to be a Mormon (and swore off of coffee), he was a prodigious user of cannabis, defending himself by saying that the Prophets had counseled using "the good herbs" for natural medicine, and since he only used "the best" he felt it fit under that category. In between that, he spent his time reading works by prominent Rosicrucians, selected works of Alistair Crowley, Swedenborg's Heaven and Hell, and surfing various Raelian [sic?] websites. He wanted me to accompany him to a peyote ranch in NM for a "spirit walk" a la Casteneda, but I demurred. He did prevail upon me to try one of his "award-winning" brownies, however. This was my first experience with cannabis, and as my system is hypersensitive/reactive to medications the results were, shall we say, "enlightening?" The brownie was a rather large square and I ate the whole thing at a sitting. Like you, nothing happened at first and I thought, "What the hell...?" Then, of course, the skin of my arms starting projecting outwards in three-dimensional cubes, like some damn Escher drawing, and the universe took on a rather intriguing 50-degree slant. I won't bother you with further details, but this particular dessert treat made for an interesting evening. The next day, he was greatly amused. "You weren't supposed to eat the whole thing! I make them really potent, and you were only supposed to try about a quarter of it. Hell, no wonder you were hallucinating...you ate about 6 "servings" of weed." Many times over the next year he brought his desserts to work and suggested I join him, claiming that it even made our standard inner-city porn-viewing homeless derelict patrons amusing. I never did, though; its hard to run InfoTrac searches with armpits and fingers designed by Salvador Dali, you know?
Keepin' It In The Family
Every organization needs a succession plan and a multi-national conglomerate like Fraters Libertas is no different. It's important to know that you have resources available to fill critical roles in the future. For example, what would happen if Atomizer stepped in front of a bus tomorrow (other than the local Bombay Sapphire distributor not being able to send his kids to college)? A deep bench is indeed an invaluable asset. The problem is that good help is tough to find. We hung a sign in the front window of the sprawling Fraters office complex a couple of months ago, but the quality of applications that we received was disappointing. A number of good candidates were no doubt turned off by our "No Flemish Need Apply" policy (Saint Paul insisted on it) or Atomizer's requirement of four year's of rodent extermination experience. The one applicant who actually might have worked out fled from the interview in tears after her snide remark about Applebee's chicken fingers incurred the wrath of JB Doubtless. "Here's a witty rejoinder for ya!" We finally decided that the answer was an internship program. But bringing on a college or even high school student would only be a short term solution. To ensure the viability of the Fraters franchise, we need to look beyond 2005 or even 2010. We're talking about young talent that we can tap well into the future. And, at the risk of being accused of nepotism, I think it's safe to say that with the birth of our son on Saturday, the investment in that future begins now. Nathaniel is seven pounds six ounces of pure blogging potential. He doesn't seem to have a lot to say right now (eat, sleep, cry, expel bodily waste, eat, sleep, cry, expel bodily waste...), but he figures to have plenty to opine on in the future. Look for a hard hitting review of onesies soon. Nathaniel, Mom, and I will be spending the next few weeks at home and so blogging, like sleep, may be intermittent. However, what I may lose in time in the Land of Nod, I should more than make up for in blogging material. From what I understand, these little babies can be gold (gold Jerry!) in that area. Other local bloggers seem to have done quite well with kid blogging. Heck, some have just about made a career out of it. Now I just need a cute nickname. Maybe Nat... Sunday, July 24, 2005
All He Needs Are Some Tasty Waves, A Cool Buzz, And He's Fine
After reading the Eagan police report in today's St. Paul Pioneer Press, I began to wonder if Chad The Elder had wandered from the AM1280 studios in search of emergency sustenance: Possible drug activity: Someone at McDonald's, 3045 Holiday Lane, called police Friday after hearing a customer say he had been smoking all day and now has the "munchies".Then again, Chad rarely goes to McDonald's when he's baked. He prefers to stay home, crank up some Phish on the stereo and devour an entire 14" deep dish Meatzza Feast pizza. As Chad likes to say: "That Domino's dude delivers some mighty tasty 'za." Saturday, July 23, 2005
Coach Enjoys Kissing His Sister
At the risk of treading all over The Elder's hallowed territory, I'm going to comment here about the end of the NHL lockout. Specifically, this St. Paul Pioneer Press article about the newly approved rule changes contains a few quotes from Minnesota Wild coach Jacques Lemaire that really caught my eye. One of the new rules eliminates the ridiculous practice of calling a game a tie if neither team scores a goal in the brief overtime period and replaces it with the always exciting shootout. Lemaire had this to say about that: The shootout is great for fans, but the results are not always good. I think it will favor the top teams. You go into a shootout against Colorado, who's got the better chance to win?Yes, Jacques, Colorado has a better chance of putting the biscuit in the basket during a shootout than the Wild does. Please tell me how in the hell that makes the shootout any different from the 65 minutes of hockey that both teams just completed. What the elimination of the tie actually accomplishes is that it prevents both teams from skating around in circles for the entirety of the overtime period in order to guarantee at least one more point for each in the standings. Coach Lemaire continues: If you're home, the fans will be excited about a shootout, no doubt. But what if you don't win? Sometimes you tie games in the end and you're happy. You go to a shootout and lose, as a player, you still lost, and that stays in your mind.Moses, smell the roses! What utter tripe. Part of your job as coach, Mr. Lemaire, is to make damn sure that every single humiliating and demoralizing loss by your team DOES stick in their minds...so much so that they never want it to happen again. I have zero confidence in a team that is coached by a man who claims to feel happy after achieving an incredibly ignoble tie. If Lemaire's attitude regarding shootouts is any indication, it looks like the Wild players (or is it "the Wild's players"? God, how I hate that name) will be joining the Minnesota Twins in watching their sport's post-season from the comfort of their easy chairs. Friday, July 22, 2005
US Responsible For Obesity Epidemic In Iraq?
The following is a letter sent from a soldier in Iraq to a newspaper columnist. The names of both parties have been omitted to protect the innocent. Or the not so innocent. Dear Mr. ****, Hello from FOB Lima! I just wanted to thank you for your excellent column from a couple of weeks ago. Sorry I didn't get a chance to write earlier, but it sounds like you know what it's like from the field - no down time. Anyway, it's been making the rounds out here and everyone agrees we need more reporters like you. I'm with the 155th from Ole Miss, and let me tell you how good it is to finally hear somebody in the media getting the story straight. Fact is, things are changing for the better in Iraq, and it's thanks to the US of A. I thought I'd share some stories that reinforce your point. We're working in Karbala, and I'd say at least 90 percent of the population loves us. Sometimes there are so many kids around waving to us that it creates a mini-traffic jam. I've even noticed a few fat kids starting to appear - didn't see too much of that during Saddam's reign, now, did you? I can already imagine how the liberal media would twist that story: "Obesity Epidemic in Iraq" instead of celebrating that these kids have the freedom to eat what and how much they want for the first time. Of course, if you read about Karbala in the media, you'll probably think that the whole city is a bunch of jihad-crazed terrorists and we're afraid to even enter city limits. Yeah, right! Then how'd our team build five water stations? I mean, I'm not denying that there are terrorists out there, but we're making progress. Terrorists have temporarily disabled two, but it's still a net gain. And we're not finished yet. Maybe if those reporters left the Green Zone some time and spent some time with the people, like we do every day, they'd find out that the Iraqis want to become more like Americans, and that they don't hate us at all. I mean, our translator's even taken to hankering for country music! Another example is the first reality show in Iraq - definitely a sign things are changing here for the better. It's about a couple planning for their marriage. Our translator was telling me all about it - the bride's brother actually was killed by terrorists during the filming, but the family didn't let itself be intimidated. That's how addictive freedom can be. If you ask me, that's the change here that I've noticed since getting stationed here in January - the terrorists are still out there, but the people aren't intimidated any more. It's like there's been a trickle down effect from the Army's bravery. Now if a bomb goes off outside a recruiting station, the next day the lines of recruits are just as long. That's having faith in the new Iraq. They're finally understanding the American way. With that sort of attitude, the terrorists don't stand a chance. Well, I've gotta fire off some emails back home, but just wanted to say, keep up the good work. Seeing smart commentary like yours is a real morale boost. Thank you, and God bless, 1st Lt. ****** **** The Real World Baghdad? He's right, Zarqawi and crew don't stand a chance. UPDATE: More on unintended consequences here.
Although it's nothing compared to what areas of the country are currently suffering through, it's been noted that, until a break in the action on Monday, we've been sweltering through what passes for a heat wave in these parts:
It was a good run for the Twin Cities: nine days of 90 degrees or better. But we could have been a contender if only we had held on until Tuesday. Then we would have tied for the second-longest hot spell in the state's history. Last weekend, the 2005 MS75 (seventy-five mile inline skate from Hinckley to Duluth) was held. This would have been my fifth straight year participating in the fundraiser to help fight multiple sclerosis, but developments on another front prevented me from joining the fun. Looks like my timing was impeccable. That will leave us tied for the third-longest heat wave, right up there with July 1932, July 1937, June and July 1949 and the hot, dry summer of 1988. Ah yes, the summer of '88. Having experienced more than my share of summer that year, I would also add LONG to the list of adjectives used to describe it. Back when the summer of 1988 began, I was a mere lad of nineteen. By the time it was over, I was a lean, well-tanned (tanned as well as someone of Irish-German descent can ever hope to be) man of twenty. The long, hot, dry summer of 1988. My summer on the lawn crew. Lawn and landscaping crew that is. Most of the time I was on the lawn patrol, although I did a little sod busting as well. It may not sound like the most glamorous job in the world, but for a college kid looking to make a few bucks while home for the summer, it fit the bill. It offered a chance to work outside, the opportunity for overtime (important to maximize your income during the summer months), and best of all, involved little or no thinking. I was the perfect man for the job. The pace at the beginning was frantic. Lawns needed to be cut every week, our crew was undermanned, and thus we were overworked. Early on that summer, I spent many an hour steering a "walk behind", becoming a pro with a weed whacker, and discovering that carrying a gas-powered leaf blower on your back in the heat of the day can get a little sticky. Not that I minded. The more green I cut, the more green I made. Looking back on those days, one thing that really stands out for me is not only what I did at work, but what I did after work. It was not unusual to spend ten to twelve hours working outside, come home for a quick bite, go down to the park and play hoops until it got dark, and then hit a local watering hole for a pitcher or two (or three). And then get up the next day and do it all over again. Ah, the energy of youth. As the summer wore on and grew increasingly hotter and drier, the need to cut lawns diminished. But since most of our jobs were contracts that covered the entire season, we went out and mowed anyway. By the end of July, we were essentially just running the machines over dirt, stirring up huge clouds of dust as we went. We were hot, sweaty, dirty, and most of all miserable. I don't know how long the dry spell lasted, but it seemed like it didn't rain at all from the beginning of July until almost the end of August. I can still recall a stifling hot afternoon late in the summer when we had just finished up at an apartment complex. Suddenly, black clouds rolled in and the skies opened up for a tantalizingly short lived spot of precipitation. We were whoopin', hollerin', and dancin' around like kids running through a sprinkler. It was our manna falling from heaven. Rain never felt so good. It was a summer that offered many a learning experience for a young man in my position. And many of those experiences involved Larry. Larry was a lifer on the lawn crew. Not in the sense that he would spend his career working for this particular company in this particular field. It was just the type of work that Larry probably had done up to that point in his life and would do again throughout it. Larry was in his mid to late thirties. I was paired up with Larry my first day on the job and rode with him in a pickup for most of the summer, so I got to know him pretty well. He claimed to have been in the Navy and had the tattoos to prove it, but, like most of Larry's stories, you took that claim with a grain of salt. He had been married a couple of times and had a few kids here and there. He liked to smoke unfiltered Chesterfields, enjoyed a beer or twelve on a regular basis, and was one of the first examples that I ever noticed of irrational economic decision making. Every day Larry would stop at the Super America (gas station and convenience store usually referred to as "SA" in these parts), buy two packs of smokes, donuts for breakfast, a couple of sodas, a sandwich for lunch, and maybe a Gatorade. He was dropping over $20 a pop for his daily fixins. He never bought a carton of cigarettes, a case of Coke, or bread and meat to make sandwiches. He never ate breakfast before work. He never brought a lunch from home. He was an early inspiration for my October 2002 post, Life In The Deli Express Lane, in which I speculated on the lifetime cost of such a convenience lifestyle. He liked to talk a lot about p***y (here after referred to as P). The P he had gotten. The P he was getting now. And the P he was going to get in the future. In his mind, he was quite a man of the world and proud of his accomplishments in this arena. I was considerably less impressed with his game when I actually met his then girlfriend when we stopped by their apartment one day at lunch. Her name was CC and, after getting a gander at her, I could never listen to the song "CC Rider" the same way again. But Larry's main interest in life was getting stoned. Most of the time I knew him, he was under the influence of the herb. And he wasn't real shy about it either. My first day on the job, I was told to ride with Larry. The pickup truck hadn't even reached the end of the company's driveway before Larry broke out his little porcelain pipe and started packing it up. Later, I came to marvel at his ability to simultaneously pack a bowl, smoke a cigarette, and drive the truck (with trailer full of lawn equipment behind it). That first day, he noticed me noticing him and offered, "You want a hit?" Now being a FNG as well as a nineteen year old kid trying hard to fit in with the crew, I didn't express what initially came to my mind, "Are you freakin' crazy?" Instead, I played it cool and nonchalantly shrugged and demurred, "Nah, not today" as if I had just turned down an offer to partake of a Cherry Life Saver rather than an illicit drug. During the long, hot summer of 1988, Larry would bake at least two or three times a day in my presence. If memory serves, he never missed an opportunity to offer to share the pleasures of the pipe with me. And every time, probably hundreds of times over the course of the summer, I politely but firmly turned him down. Until one day. I don't recall exactly what lead me to just say yes to Larry. Maybe it was because it was near the end of the summer and I only had a week or two left before I returned to school. Maybe it was because it was a Friday and I wanted to start the weekend early. Or maybe I felt that somehow, after being asked day after day and declining, I owed it to my brother in lawns. Whatever my motivations may have been, I took the plunge. After a couple of decent pulls, I still wasn't feeling anything. Larry had always assured me that he only smoked "the good s***", but now I was beginning to have my doubts. As I put pipe to lip and prepared for another hit, Larry warned me, "You better be careful man. That's some real good Hawaiian s***." I smiled as I inhaled deeply. Yeah, whatever Larry, I thought. Seems more like North Dakota ditch weed. I was just about to share these sentiments with Larry when it hit me like a ton of hemp sandals. If it was an after-school special, this is where the Hendrix riff would have kicked in. And indeed, I was soon kissing the sky. I was not a complete stranger to the world of weed, but Larry's warning was well founded. This was some good s***. At first, I enjoyed the ride. Cruising along in the truck I was flying high. Sitting on Cloud Ten (one higher) man. Life was beautiful. Stoned out of my gourd and getting paid for it. Why didn't I do this every day at work? Oh yeah. Work. Our first stop of the day was at a prominent estate on Lake Minnetonka inhabited by one of the heirs of a family that had made its mark in the local milling scene. Mowing under the influence wasn't all that bad. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to operate a walk behind in a competent manner. However, another chore tested my dexterity and coordination. The house had a large deck area in back that was not accessible from the ground. Part of the job was to clear it of debris each week with a leaf blower. Apparently the owners didn't want the "help" inside the house, so one of us would strap the gas-powered leaf blower on, and clamber up the side of the house to reach the deck. Under normal circumstances it was actually a somewhat enjoyable task to perform. Under the haze I was operating in at that time, it was a challenge. I slowly and carefully scaled the side of the house and reached the deck. Then I performed what was probably the most thorough and complete cleaning of the deck area ever. I blew every leaf, twig, and piece of dirt off. It probably took me three times as long as normal, but damn was that deck clean. I likely would have spent the whole day up there cleaning it down to the subatomic particle level had Larry not summoned me with a shout of, "What the hell are you doing? Let's go." After reaching the ground, I realized that being stoned in dusty ninety plus degree heat and operating a leaf blower gives you a bout of cotton mouth without equal. I also began to experience one of the key downsides of smoking weed on the job. Time crawls by. To me it seemed as if we had been on the job for hours on end and that surely it was almost time to go home. In reality, it had only been a couple of hours since we arrived. At that point, I was ready to return to "normal." It had been fun for a while, but the fun had passed. I wanted to get that feeling of control back. Unfortunately, one of the consequences of smoking Larry's "really good s***" was that the high lasted a really long time. Way too long for my comfort. I pounded a Gatorade to momentarily relieve my saliva free mouth and hopped in the truck with Larry. I don't know why regular pot smokers take such pleasure in seeing others who normally don't partake get stoned, but Larry was having a grand old time knowing that I was still reeling from the hits earlier in the day. He informed me that we were going to meet up with the rest of the crew and take lunch at another site and that our boss Rick would be there. For some reason Rick and I had never hit it off that well. Maybe it was my often sarcastic sense of humor. Maybe it was the time I put a live gopher in his lunch cooler as a practical joke. Hey, how was I to know that he'd reach into it while driving? Anyway there wasn't a lot of love lost between us and the prospect of having to see him in my current state suddenly filled me with dread. Yeah, the ol' paranoia started kickin' in hard and heavy. Larry picked up on this and drove me to the point of panic by telling me that it was obvious to anyone that I was stoned. That Rick would surely notice and no doubt fire me on the spot. The drive to our lunch location was pure hell. I was petrified that Rick would pick up on my condition and was trying my damndest to sober up in a hurry. "Don't act stoned. Don't act stoned. Don't act stoned?" was the mantra I quietly repeated to myself over and over as we neared my appointment with certain doom. Larry, now the very embodiment of the Serpent in my mind, found the whole situation hilarious and cackled at my plight. Luckily my fears proved to be unfounded. We arrived at the appointed location, shot the breeze with Rick for a few minutes, and went off to have lunch. He never even looked twice at me, and in hindsight, the chances of him suspecting anything were slim. Of course, with my marijuana induced paranoia (made worse by Larry's prodding) there wasn't much room for rational thought or logic. After a couple of more hours, the effects finally wore off completely. By then I was completely shot and wanted nothing more than to go home and crash. But I still had to toil for a few more hours. It was one of the longest working days of my life and taught me a valuable lesson: Stoned, paranoid, and stupid is no way to go through a day at work. It was a lesson that I've learned well. The most important lesson that I learned during the long, hot, dry summer of 1988 is a lesson that summer jobs, like my stint on the lawn crew, have been teaching college age kids for years and years. Stay in school, study, and get a degree. You don't want to be Larry. Labels: Misspent Youth Thursday, July 21, 2005
behind every joke there's some truth
How can I not link to a post called, The Syllogisms of Seinfeld: The Connections Between Logic and Humor? Type #1 -- Hasty Generalizations -- occurs when a generalization is made from too few cases or, as often seen in humour, when the generalization is obviously not true as a literal statement (a clear exaggeration). "So, what you are saying is that ninety to ninety-five percent of the population is undateable?" "Undateable!" "Then how are all these people getting together?" "Alcohol." - Elaine and Jerry, in "The Wink"
A Wide Open Field
Due to travel and other schedule conflicts, the mighty Fraters trivia squad will not be on hand at Keegan's Irish Pub & Restaurant tonight to extend our current winning streak to three weeks (and forty-nine overall). This means that tonight's trivia title is anybody's to win and those squads thus far unable to savor the sweet nectar of victory have a window of opportunity. A window that no doubt will be slammed shut with extreme prejudice next week upon our return. And yes, even though we won't be there to hear it, we fully expect to be booed in absentia. We would want it no other way.
Should It Pay To Work For A Non-Profit?
There's a very interesting article in today's Pioneer Press by Edward Lotterman on what the dispute between Minnesota AG Mike Hatch and Medica demonstrates about why people work: Minnesota Attorney General Mike Hatch has an uncanny knack for raising questions that illustrate fundamental issues in economics. His suit against Medica, which goes to mediation today, is a prime example. It involves a core question in economics: What motivates people to work? The suit involves pay for Medica's board of directors. Hatch charges the directors "hijacked" the organization and are paying themselves excessive amounts for serving on the board. Board members average $50,000 to $60,000 annually. Medica replies that this is fair for the effort required and on par with other nonprofit HMOs nationally. 50 to 60K a year to serve on a board is hardly excessive when measured against the for-profit companies. The question is whether people working for non-profits should expect to receive less pay and benefits: Many believe that those who work for charitable or nonprofit institutions should accept less money than those doing similar jobs at for-profit businesses. This belief lies at the heart of the attorney general's suit. The lines are not clear, however. Managers of nonprofit social service agencies often earn much less than those doing similar work in businesses. The gap for custodians or webmasters is smaller. Accounting and legal firms may charge nonprofits less for their services than they do businesses. But nonprofits typically pay the same price for gasoline, light bulbs and copier paper as everyone else. And claims processors at nonprofit HMOs earn about as much as their counterparts at comparable for-profit institutions, as do and cardiac surgeons at nonprofit hospitals. So do most other salaried workers with comparable responsibilities. For what it's worth, I come down on this side of the argument: Others respond that you get what you pay for. If you want people with the experience and skills to run a large organization, they must find it worth their time, one way or another. Moreover, an inexperienced board is more likely to fall captive to the organizations' full-time managers. This is a far more common problem in large anonymous member organizations such as Medica or mutual insurance companies and pension funds than overpayment of directors. In some respects, the need for a strong board with high caliber members is greater at non-profits than at regular businesses. There are no shareholders with a stake in the business to keep tabs on the board and bring pressure against it if results don't meet expectations as there are at for-profit companies. There is no stock price to use to gauge performance (however imperfect that measurement tool can be). It's in the best interests of non-profits like Medica (and their customers) to put together the best board they can. And that usually doesn't come cheap. UPDATE: It doesn't get much better than this. Thanks King. Wednesday, July 20, 2005
True Colors Shining Through
Glen Reynolds, The Instapundit a.k.a. the J.J. Hunsecker of the 'sphere, notes that California AG Bill Lockyer is in the news again for all the wrong reasons and asks: First Lockyer was advocating prison rape and now this. Does he have a political tin ear -- or is he just a jerk? It's hard to believe, though, that California couldn't find someone better for the job. We received an anonymous e-mail from someone who knows Lockyer quite well that appears to answer the question: Years ago, when he was a State Senator, Governor Wilson called a special session of the legislature to toughen criminal penalties. One of the bills offered was a "one-strike" rape bill offered by Senator Bergeson. Senator Bergeson and the Governor's Office had brought in to testify before the Judiciary Committee in support of the bill a woman whose daughter had been raped and stabbed 40 times by a repeat offender rapist. At the time of her testimony, her daughter was still in the hospital. Anyway, after she was done with her very moving testimony, Senator Lockyer let go with a tirade about how tired he was of the Governor's Office bringing in these people who tell these stories and waste the Senate's time. He ranted that he was going to review the budget for the particular office of the Governor that was responsible for this (Office of Criminal Justice Planning) for wasting their time. A hush fell over the room and that Chairman, Democrat Senator David Roberti looked ill. Eventually, one of the other witnesses, who was not a government employee, laid back into Lockyer. By this time, of course, Lockyer had left his seat and was happily chatting with someone to the side of the room, ignoring what was going on. Senator Roberti, to his credit, apologized. I witnessed all that myself. Every so often, he will let slip the mask he wears, and you can see the raging lefty that he really is. Whether it is threatening Clinton donor Ken Lay with prison rape, or telling residents of gated communities that they would be burned out of their homes. Based on that testimony, I gotta go with jerk. Don't worry, we will not be revealing our source no matter what consequences may come as a result. It's a matter of principle and I'm more than willing to have Atomizer go to jail to uphold that right.
Newsflash: MoveOn Thinks Roberts Is An Extremist
Stunned. Stunned I am that MoveOn.org is coming through on their promise to fight "If Bush announces an extremist nominee..." From an e-mail sent out this morning: In the past weeks, Republicans and Democrats have called on President Bush to nominate a moderate for the Supreme Court--someone who would honor the legacy of independent Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. But last night, President Bush nominated Judge John Roberts, a far-right lawyer and corporate lobbyist, to fill her post on the Supreme Court. We've got to stop Roberts. He opposed clean air rules and worked to help coal companies strip-mine mountaintops. He worked with Ken Starr (yes, that Ken Starr), and tried to keep Congress from defending the Voting Rights Act. He wrote that Roe v. Wade should be "overruled," and as a lawyer argued (and won) the case that stopped some doctors from even discussing abortion. I also understand that he once shared a cab with John Ashcroft (yes, that John Ashcroft). This is one of the most important domestic fights of President Bush's career. We can win--Americans overwhelmingly want a moderate judge. But to win, we need to get the word out early that Roberts is out of the mainstream. President Bush could have chosen many fair-minded and independent jurists to replace Sandra Day O'Connor. Instead, he chose a corporate partisan loved by Bush's right-wing base but out of step with the rest of the country. MoveOn.org of course is in "the mainstream" and in step with the rest of the country. Let the lunacy begin. Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Roberts Just Another Extremist Judge
Sisyphus at Nihilist In Golf Pants is out with his Top 11 Indications that John Roberts is Out of the Mainstream: 4. He agrees with more than half of the Ten Commandments.
Soldiers' Angels Update
Andy from Residual Forces is also on board the adopt a soldier blogwagon. There's still plenty of room left. UPDATE: Swiftee reminds us that he's in: I usually prefer to keep my altruistic acts a private matter between myself and the BIG GUY [Mitch?] (I've got a reputation to uphold), but the peer pressure is becoming unbearable. If you gents were not sooo busy googling trivia answers at Keegan's, you'd have noticed that I had already taken full responsibility two weeks ago for moral boosting duties where PFC Stevan ******** is concerned. One's imagination runs wild speculating on the contents of one of Swiftee's morale boosting "care" packages.
Bush To Plug Hole By Fingering Dike
Bush to introduce court nominee tonight: President Bush settled on a nominee for the Supreme Court on Tuesday and the White House made arrangements for a nationally televised prime time announcement. "I'll let you know when I'm ready," he said at a midday news conference where he declined to tip his hand. That only intensified speculation on his choice for the first opening on the court in more than a decade and a replacement for Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. The announcement was set for 9 p.m. EDT from the East Room of the White House. The nominee's family was expected to be with Bush and the candidate. Let the fun begin: (Sorry about the title. I just couldn't resist.)
Memo To Mark Yost
TO: Mark Yost, Associate Editor St. Paul Pioneer Press FROM: A concerned bystander RE: Why they hate us I understand that your boss isn't too happy with all the talk that your column on media coverage of the war in Iraq has generated and, as a result, he has slapped a gag order on you to quell any further discussions of the matter. I strongly applaud this move and urge you cease and desist from engaging in any conservations on the column, people's reactions to it, and the reaction to those reactions, both in public and in private. Such conversations are drawing unwanted attention to the column, to you, and to the newspaper. In the advertising business this is known as "buzz" and that's the last thing the Pioneer Press needs these days. Because if people hear about this column they might start reading the paper. Even subscribing to it. Then the advertisers start banging on your door. Next thing you know, you're actually building a reputation as a legitimate competitor to the Star Tribune in the local marketplace instead of cowering in the shadows and picking at the Strib's leftovers. None of us would want that, right? I mean c'mon Mark, it's one thing to take the field with the Park Bugle, but do you really expect the Pioneer Press to play in the big leagues? Remember Mark, this is St. Paul, Minnesota. We don't like to make waves or stand out in any way. We like it here. The Pioneer Press is a nice little newspaper just trying to get by. So why can't you just be a good little columnist and play nice with your friends in the media? From now on, let's pretend that this little, unpleasant column never even existed. When people ask you about the reaction to the column, you say, "Column? What column? I didn't write any column about media coverage of the war in Iraq. You must be thinking of Jack Kelly at the Pittsburgh Post Gazette. Ask him to be interviewed on TV. Write blog posts about him. Link to his newspaper's web site. Talk about him at the water cooler. Read his newspaper." You'll look back on this one day and realize that it really was the best thing for you, your column, and the newspaper. Oh by the way, the British have a message for the Pioneer Press too. They're demanding that the paper quit using a bulldog as its mascot. Something about destroying the brand image that they're worked so hard to build. They suggest that an appropriate alternative for the Pioneer Press would be a French Poodle.
(UPDATE: Still plenty of time to make your reservations)
Regular listeners of local talk radio titan AM 1280 - The Patriot are probably already well aware of the station's upcoming Patriot Picnic, but in case you haven't heard yet here are all the details: FREE Patriot Frisbee to first 300 listeners! FREE lunch provided at 11:30AM!(while supplies last) Join AM1280 The Patriot on Saturday, July 30th for a Patriot Picnic! The Patriot Picnic will take place at Staring Lake Park of Eden Prairie. In appreciation of you loyalty to AM1280, this is a free event! There will be a LIVE broadcast, a picnic lunch, Patriot merchandise and giveaways. Please let us know if you're coming so we can plan our picnic lunch. Call 651-289-4455 or click here to pre-register. The LIVE broadcast will feature smokin' David Strom on the recently expanded Taxpayers League Live Show (now with 50% more chortling) from 9am until noon with The Northern Alliance Radio Network following up from noon until 3pm. It should be a great day for food, fun, frolic, and FREE Frisbees. Frisbees that will no doubt come in handy at the nine-hole championship Frolf course at Staring Lake Park. Frolf being Frisbee golf or "disc golf" as devotees of the sport (like Saint Paul) prefer to call it. Frolf in the park with the TPL and the NARN? It really don't get much better. If you need directions to Staring Lake Park you can find them here. Labels: NARN (04-05) Monday, July 18, 2005
Urban Legends
Nathan e-mails to point out a contradiction: I'd love to hear somebody reconcile Global Warming with New Urbanism. New Urbanists want everybody to move back downtown, increase urban density to create ridership to support the TRAIN. Dense populations create a heat island. So if the New Urbanists had their way, Minneapolis would get hotter and hotter. Paul Douglas says Minneapolis endorses Kyoto. Great. The Council should order an AC ban (like a sprinkler ban, cool your department store on alternate days only). Pack thousands of people into apartments to prevent them from moving to the suburbs, shut off all the air conditioners to comply with Kyoto, and it will take how long, exactly, for the riots to start? I dunno. I suppose we could ask the French. Speaking of the French, Nathan also points out (via The Q&O Blog) that it appears that their enthusiasm for car sharing has its limits: They might have been congratulated for their "green" efforts in an area of heavy air pollution. Instead a group of French cleaning ladies who organised a car-sharing scheme to get to work are being taken to court by a coach company which accuses them of "an act of unfair and parasitical competition". The women, who live in Moselle and work five days a week at EU offices in Luxembourg, are being taken to court by Transports Schiocchet Excursions, which runs a service along the route. It wants the women to be fined and their cars confiscated. Yes, sometimes its not easy being a modern Frenchman. On the one hand, car sharing is good. But on the other, the freedom to compete is bad. "Using our cars is quicker and at least twice as cheap. And on the bus we didn't have the right to eat or even to speak," said Martine Bourguignon. Odette Friedmann added: "In the evening instead of coming to get us at 9.30pm the bus would arrive at 10.30pm. If you made any comment to the driver you'd get a mouthful of abuse." You will take the bus. It will cost more. You will not eat or speak. It will be late. And if you complain, you'll be verbally slapped down. Vive La France!
David Strom and his wife Margaret Martin, whose philosophy of life is live like a liberal, vote like a conservative and...
Mike Erlandson and his wife Dawn Erlandson, whose philosophy of life appears to be live like a conservative, vote like a liberal? (By the way I wonder if Dawn ever drives the 'Lade to the Green Institute or the Great Plains Institute for Sustainable Development meetings?) Labels: Separated At Birth
Soldiers' Angels Adoption Update
On July 7th at Keegan's Irish Pub, in just over two hours, volunteers from Soldiers' Angels signed twenty people up to adopt a soldier. Keegan's itself adopted an entire battalion and has been collecting funds at the pub to support those soldiers. Among the bloggers responding to my challenge for each blog to adopt its own soldier, are The Night Writer and The Smoothing Plane. Kerry from The Smoothing Plane e-mailed with an update: Chad, I adopted one, or he adopted me about ten days ago, following the death of the Seals in Afghanistan. Interestingly enough, like me, he is a classical music aficionado, and we've talked Grieg et. al. back and forth. Nice shootin' pardner. Soldiers' Angels makes it very easy for you to lend a hand. Sign up to adopt a soldier here. They'll provide you with contact information. Send a letter or an e-mail once a week. Send a care package once a month. A little work on your end here means a lot to those serving over there. Sign up today. Sunday, July 17, 2005
MOB Expansion Continues
Please welcome the newest member of the Minnesota Organization of Bloggers, Zatera Ul.
In this world nothing is certain but death and...fees?
Doug e-mails to express his confusion: While I have lived in Minnesota for several years (and happily so) I was born and raised in the Ozark Hills. Way back there in that backwards area of this great country we had a name for people who do the kind of things Pawlenty is doing with his "health impact fee". We called it lying. I am certain that I have to be missing something here. I mean after all, didn't Tim sign a pledge not to raise taxes? Wait, never mind, this is not a tax it is a "health impact fee" Do you happen to remember a former President that made a very memorable statement when he said, under oath, "Depends on what the meaning of is is." Minnesota is my adopted home. Having traveled the entire United States, I picked Minnesota as the most desirable place to live. The lakes, the summers and even the winters attracted me. I do however find it sad that "Minnesota Nice" seems to mean that you tax, sorry fee, the poorest of Minnesotans into an even worse position. This group of people has made the choice to smoke, a very community oriented choice and a great sacrifice which should be honored. The choice they have made to smoke means they will die early and as a result not become a burden on our great society. This group of people happens to also be the group most likely to require taxpayer support in later life. They, on the whole, have no savings and no assets to speak of and in order to help reduce the potential burden they pose to Minnesota taxpayers, they smoke. They realize that by smoking they are supporting the state. Smoking means they will die early and reduce the impact they will have on the hard working people of Minnesota. How do we, the state of Minnesota nice, reward them? We tax, sorry fee, them to death. While the sacrifice that poor smokers make for Minnesota make may not rise to the level of the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, it does much to decrease the burden on the taxpayers of Minnesota. As a person that has, by choice, made Minnesota my home it saddens me that we could elect a "Republican" governor who, with a very straight face, could defend such a obvious example of political double speak repeatedly. As for Hugh, I always thought he was a conservative. Sorry Hugh for not understanding you. You are a true citizen of "the state where nothing is allowed." In the interest of full discloser I am not a smoker. I do eat at McDonalds however and I can see the day when my Big Mac's will have some special tax, sorry I keep using that word I really meant fee. As we all know a fee is not the same as a tax. After writing this I have to ask for your help. I graduated from college, and in fact had a fairly good GPA, but I can't understand the difference between a tax and a fee. I really need your help here, I know there is a difference because the governor says there is but I can't seem to comprehend it. I am feeling so stupid right now and I don't know where to turn. I am sincerely hoping you can explain the difference between a tax and a fee. As I said earlier I am just a dumb hillbilly and as a result I need help understanding this. I am sure it is an easy thing to explain because when I saw Tim Pawlenty talking about it and he smiled the smile of someone that was looking down on me, he made it obvious that there was something about this whole thing I just don't understand. I am sure you will answer me. I am from such a backwards area of the US that I am having a really hard time with this. We were so simple that we thought that when the government took money out of your pocket it was called a tax but then again we were just dumb hillbillies. Saturday, July 16, 2005
Let's See, One Apple Cruller, A Bear Claw, A Dozen Jelly And Whatever Cash You Have
I love reading the NRA's monthly magazine and especially the Armed Citizen column. It's all the stories buried by the MSM where God-fearing, law-abiding citizens blast worthless criminals to kingdom come after being attacked. In fact, these stories are so fun to read, I had to find more and luckily found this site. There's a good ten years of stories there to keep a smile on your face and a hand on your gat. I especially enjoyed this one, where a Dunkin Donuts employee foiled a would-be robbery: District Attorney Robert Schwarz refused to charge an Albuquerque, New Mexico, Dunkin' Donuts employee with any wrongdoing after the armed store clerk killed one of two would-be robbers. The two suspects had entered the store posing as customers. When the clerk turned to get their donuts they drew guns and demanded cash. The clerk refused. One bandit fired a single shot at the clerk, barely missing his head, and the other bandit jumped over the counter and attempted to shoot the employee, but his gun jammed. By then, the clerk had retrieved his own handgun and returned fire, fatally injuring the suspect who had jumped the counter. The dead crook's accomplice fled the building. (The Journal, Albuquerque, NM, 9/6/96) What a great American! The guy is just trying to make an honest living selling some delicious donuts (I've got to make the donuts) and various other battered goodies and these scum just expect him to hand over the dough. I just love the attitude of the guy that he wasn't going to bend over for these human debris and instead gave them a little taste of their own.
Dane'nt No Way Yer Gitting Any Pizza!
As a life-long conservative I support independent businessmen to be able to do (or not) business with anyone they like. For example, if I owned a bar, I would ban all Packers fans and Democrats from imbibing. It would be a Don't Ask Don't Get Booted policy, so as long as you don't mention the Pack or how you love raising taxes, you could stay. But open your big trap about any of that krep in MY bar and your gone. But this is (or should be) America and a guy MIGHT be able to get away with something as kooky as that, but I was very surprised and delighted to find this great story in yesterday's WSJ: (am I starting to sound like Scott Johnson?) A Danish court found Aage Bjerre guilty of discrimination Tuesday, and he will spend eight days in jail for refusing to serve French and German customers in his pizza shop on Denmark's Fanoe Island. Mr. Bjerre instituted the ban in 2003 to protest France and Germany's opposition to US led effort to overthrow Saddam Hussein. The initial response in tolerant Denmark included rampant vandalism against his pizzeria. Mr. Bjerre told Ap Tuesday that while he chose jail over a $900 fine, "eight days is a small price to pay when American soldiers go to Iraq and risk their limbs and lives." Who knew any of the Danes had a pair? We here at Fraters would like to raise a frosty Boulevard Pale Ale to Aage Bjerre of Denmark for keeping the spirit of Barry Goldwater alive and sticking it (sticking it!) to the frogs and krauts who wanted to get a slice of pie. Jubelrĺbet! Friday, July 15, 2005
You wanna be taxin' somethin', you got to be taxin' somethin'
Last night, on his nationally syndicated talk show, Hugh Hewitt twice heartily endorsed Minnesota's new "health impact fee" (read tax) on tobacco, which helped seal the budget deal and end the state government "shutdown." First, with Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty where Hugh said: You know, I actually have no problem with that. I don't care what the anti-tax hard core says, I believe in taxing the heck out of cigarettes because of externalities and [unintelligible]. It's good economics. It is? Looks like Hugh knows about as much about good economics as he does wine. Or hockey. Or music. Or... Well, you get the idea. Let's see what someone with a bit more of a background in the field has to say: Third, this notion that the externalities are so large from smoking has been disputed. David [Strom] has been citing Kip Viscusi's analysis, which argues that states are compensated for medical and nursing home costs from smoking already. There's a benefit to smokers dying younger -- they don't burden Social Security, they don't linger in hospitals in their 90s by and large. Cruel logic, sure -- they don't call us the 'dismal science' for nothing! -- but if you are going to add up all the external costs, you need to also add up the external benefits of reduced longevity. Actually that is just one of four solid points that King Banaian makes to refute the arguments of Hugh and Governor Pawlenty that the "health impact fee" was the right way to resolve the budget dilemma. Read them all. Hugh crowed a second time later in the show when he brought James Lileks on. After getting Lileks to concede that taxing cigarettes was a good and noble idea, Hugh uncorked this whopper: I mean, it's a normal ... you got to tax something, tax smoke! Not only is raising taxes "normal", we really have no choice because, according to Hugh, "you got to tax something." We do? Why exactly is raising taxes the only possible solution? God forbid if we could possibly have gotten by without increasing spending as much as we did. What would happen to the schools if we didn't pour an additional $800 some million dollars into them? A cynic might ask exactly what this additional educational largesse is really going to get us, but it's all "about the children" so it would be rude and unseemly to demand to see reforms or results, wouldn't it? I'm trying to think of what other things it would be "normal" to tax at higher rates. You know, things that are voluntary and may have negative externalities. Things like, well I don't know, maybe snack foods. How about a Cheeto tax Hugh? Or a Diet Coke tax? A Docker's tax? The burden would fall chiefly on white, middle-aged men, so why not? How about a tax on crappy folk music? Talk about negative externalities. Well, that's the end of my feet stomping. Excuse me while I run away and read my Ayn Rand again.
Just What The Doctor Ordered
Like many others, I have long admired the writing of Theodore Dalrymple. Up to this point my exposure has, for the most part, been limited to pieces of his that appear in National Review. Life at the Bottom : The Worldview That Makes the Underclass has long been on my "to read" list, but I haven't been able to see my clear to fit it into my schedule (or hoark it from the bookshelf of JB Doubtless). I was elated to receive a copy of Dalrymple's latest work, Our Culture, What's Left of It : The Mandarins and the Masses in the mail this week. I also a little worried that it might not be able to live up to the lofty expectations that I had for it. This paragraph from the third page of the preface quickly laid those concerns to rest: This is not to say, of course, that all criticism of social conventions and traditions is destructive or unjustified; surely no society in the world can have existed in which there was not much to criticize. But critics of social institutions and traditions, including writers of imaginative literature, should always be aware that civilization needs conservation as least as much as it needs change, and that immoderate criticism, or criticism from the standpoint of utopian first principles is capable of doing much--indeed devastating--harm. No man is so brilliant that he can work out everything for himself, so that the wisdom of ages has nothing useful to tell him. To imagine otherwise is to indulge in the most egotistical of hubris. That, in a nutshell, is a one of the better arguments for conservative philosophy as well as an insightful critique of what is wrong with much of the modern left. In one paragraph. In the preface. Yeah, I think this is gonna be a good read. And so far it most certainly has. The book is a series of essays on a variety of topics relating to cultural decline. One of my favorites so far is on Virginia Woolf. (Interesting note on Woolf: she was comparing people she didn't like in England to Nazis back in 1938. Talk about ahead of her time!) Dalrymple shreds the privileged, pampered yet self-pitying author with laser-like precision and cuts her to her core, which he exposes as nothing but an empty shell. The criticism is both devastating and delicious. We're hoping to land Mr. Dalrymple as a guest on the Northern Alliance Radio Network in the near future. In the meantime, I look forward to reading the rest of his book. If you enjoy sharp writing from an excellent mind, you should too.
Being Tommy Mischke
The latest edition of the local monthly The Rake has an article on the most uniquely talented voice on the local airwaves, Tommy Mischke (sorry Atomizer, but that "Can you say that?" bit is played). Once you get past the snide asides about talk radio that you would expect to find in such a story, you discover some fascinating facts about the reclusive radio host. When you listen to Mischke's show, it all seems so off the cuff that I was surprised to learn about the amount of prep he does in a section of the story discussing the differences he had with Don Vogel: At issue was the fact that Vogel liked to wing it with little or no preparation, while Mischke believed (and still believes) in gathering and fine-tuning a full load of material each day. For every show, he typically spends about six hours combing through newspapers and writing tunes on the upright piano in his home office (he's painted the black keys red and replaced the front panel with glass, so he can see the hammers as he plays). If you're interested in learning more about a true talk radio original, the piece is well worth a read. Thursday, July 14, 2005
Just One More Before We Part
Having no more need for the bookmark folder I created containing links to pages dealing with chipmunk disposal, I was doing some desktop purging this evening and found myself revisiting this page containing "humane" critter removal tips. The lack of advice on how to create ex-chipmunks must have prevented me from actually reading the page at the time I first saw it because this bit just jumped off the screen tonight (emphasis mine): The most effective deterrent I've found is a combination of "red" or "cayenne" pepper and baby powder. Mix the ingredients one to one and spray or sprinkle around the problem areas and the critters scram. A dry atomizer works well for this or an empty can with lots of tiny holes poked in the bottom.Let me be perfectly clear about this. A dry Atomizer does not work at all. Period.
Speaking Out And Removing All Doubt
Saint Paul's post on the reaction to Mark Yost's column on media coverage of the war in Iraq, highlights the latest example of what is becoming an increasingly common situation: When members of the media are accused of something (in this case biased coverage of the war) their response to the accusation not only fails to refute the charge, it actually helps prove the case being made against them. We've seen this on the national scale when it comes to the debate over liberal bias in the media and on the local level with folks like Nick Coleman and Jim Boyd. As Saint Paul mentioned (and Atomizer knows from his experience in similar situations), sometimes it just takes a little prodding to get them to come out into the open. Keep those sticks handy. SP UPDATE: The best $75 columnist in the business, Craig Westover, reminds us that Yost's self described "embarrassed" colleague, Charles Laszewski, was one of the two reporters suspended from the Pioneer Press last year for attending a John Kerry fundraising concert. According to a quote from this article, Yost did him a favor. It appears Chuck needed a little humility: "I have always strived to be an honest, ethical and hard-working reporter, and I think I have achieved that goal"
The Truth Hurts
During the media attacks during his Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign, John O'Neil took solace in the wisdom of bomber pilots, who were known to say, 'you don't know you're over the target until you start taking flack.' In that context, Mark Yost seems to have scored a direct hit with his recent column about the mainstream media's failures in its coverage of the Iraq war. Some of his distinguished colleagues in the journalist community are are stomping their feet and pounding their fists with outrage that someone from within would dare question their methods and accuracy. And they are taking their aggressions out in Forum section at media commentary site Poynter Online. Interspersed throughout are pro- and mostly con- reactions from his brethren. An example, from Pioneer Press Charles Laszewski. Read along and try to discern where this guy's reportorial priorities are (emphasis mine): The fact that you think the activities of every VFW and American Legion hall should trump a front page story on plans to finally withdraw our brave men and women from Iraq shows you don't even grasp the fundamentals of journalism and putting out a newspaper. There is much more I could say, but let me end it this way. With your column, you have spat on the copy of the brave men and women who are doing their best in terrible conditions. More than 20 reporters have died in Iraq from around the world. You have insulted them and demeaned them, and to a much lesser degree, demeaned the reporters everywhere who have been threatened with bodily harm, who have been screamed at, or denied public records, just because they wanted to present the closest approximation to the truth they could. I am embarrassed to call you my colleague. Yes, those brave men and women in Iraq, doing their best in terrible conditions .... the press corps! They're being "screamed at." I guess war really is hell. Here's another outcry, from Knight Ridder reporter Hannah Allam, characterizing the average military officer's experience in Iraq: Mr. Yost could have come with me today as I visited one of my own military buddies, who like most officers doesn't leave the protected Green Zone compound except by helicopter or massive convoy. The Army official picked me up in his air-conditioned Explorer, took me to Burger King for lunch and showed me photos of the family he misses so terribly. The official is a great guy, and like so many other soldiers, it's not politics that blind him from seeing the real Iraq. The compound's maze of tall blast wall and miles of concertina wire obscure the view, too. Damn those pampered Army officers in Iraq! Hannah, remind me again, who the real heroes are again: Perhaps Mr. Yost would be moved by our office's tribute wall to Yasser Salihee, our brave and wonderful colleague, who at age 30 joined the ranks of Iraqi civilians shot to death by American soldiers. The US military - when they're not driving their air conditioned SUVs to Burger King, they're mowing down ranks of brave and wonderful Iraqi civilians. These letters present a shocking glimpse of the perspective of the people the media have assigned to tell us the truth about what is happening in Iraq. Thanks to Mark Yost for taking a stick and prodding his colleagues enough to get them to crawl out and reveal themselves in the light of day. He's now taking some heat from his coworkers, some calling for his dismissal. Don't worry about Mark, he's a Navy man, he can take it. But if you think Yost's commentaries are a benefit to the news consumers in this town, a note to Pioneer Press management would be in order. They are certainly going to be hearing from the other side. Most of whom happen to also work there.
Should we talk about the weather? (hi, hi, hi)
Peter e-mails to relate that even the weather isn't safe from politics anymore: I went to Paul Douglas' NowCast at the Strib looking for helpful weather advice. Instead I got a lefty political diatribe that nearly-but-not-quite ties our recent hot weather to proof that Kyoto is the answer to all evils and AL Gore is a God. Or something. I didn't find any weather advice except maybe move the cold beer indoors when it gets RELLY hot out. Here's what the Weather Boy had to say: Today should be Day 6 (in a row) above 90. Is this heat quantitative proof of global warming? Of course not. But the writing is in the wall, at least that's the conclusion I've reached. I heard Al Gore speak in St. Paul on Tuesday evening. He mentioned a recent Science magazine report that outlined over 900 peer-reviewed research papers. Not one refuted the concept of climate change or warming. Scientists are speaking with one voice. Research suggests warmer oceans won't affect the frequency of hurricanes, but they may get stronger, windier and wetter. "Will we need a sudden catastrophe to jolt us into doing something?" Gore asked. Portland, Oregon has dropped carbon emissions below 1990 levels, at the same time their local economy has boomed. Minneapolis now supports the Kyoto Treaty, joining a growing list of American cities acknowledging the obvious: something has changed. "We have to realize that it's different than anything we've ever faced before. We have to think differently." An air pollution heat alert is posted for Thursday for ozone, and it looks like we may "enjoy" five more days above 90 degrees, in a row. Gee thanks for the lecture Paul. By the way, next time could you maybe tell us something a little more useful? Like the expected high for the day? The humidity level? The chances of rain? You know, the kind of stuff that actually involves the freakin' WEATHER!
Wrong For So Many Reasons
(5:14AM) Hockey in Tampa? Sigh. I'd respond to this silly slight in further detail, but I'm off to go PLAY HOCKEY before work. More later, after I'm done PLAYING HOCKEY. UPDATE: Nothing better than a little hockey in the morning to get your blood pumping. You think a bunch of ordinary guys got together and played hockey in Tampa Bay this morning? Didn't think so. The whole idea of someone in Tampa criticizing your knowledge of hockey is like someone from North Dakota telling you what to wear to the beach (I told you keep that Speedo in the drawer Mitch). When the Lightning won the Cup in 2004, the hockey gods were not happy. And so they cursed our blessed sport with the plague of a lockout. We've suffered through a year without NHL hockey. Now that a deal has been reached, we need to take steps to demonstrate our penance and appease the gods of puck. I suggest that we start by tossing the Tampa Bay Lightning on the sacrificial fire. To be followed shortly by the Florida Panthers, the Carolina Hurricanes, the Atlanta Thrashers, and the Nashville Predators. Throw the Ducks of Anaheim on the pyre for good measure as well. Move the Stars back to Minnesota (can you imagine the rivalry with teams in Minneapolis and St. Paul?). The Coyotes should return to Winnipeg as Jets and the good people of Quebec deserve to have their Nordiques more than the bandwagon jumping 'Lanche fans in Colorado. But what about the idea of making hockey a national sport you say? Forget it. The lockout killed whatever delusionary hope there ever was for that. Hockey is a regional sport and there's nothing wrong with that. It works best in places where people play, understand, and appreciate the sport. And that ain't Tampa my friend. Read more on what the NHL needs to do next from Ray Ratto here. I agree with him that this is where it needs to begin: To start, Bob Goodenow needs to be fired. And in summation, Gary Bettman needs to be fired, too. Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Balsawood Was A Gas
My home is infested with varmints. Not my house proper, mind you, but the sprawling half acre of earth that it rests upon. The trouble began this past January when I discovered that a collection of no good homeless mice had taken refuge under the wood pile in my garage. I dealt with those little squatters the same way I deal with their human compatriots...with callous indifference. I figured that as long as they stayed in the garage, kept to themselves and didn't try to bum a smoke off me on my way out the door, they could stay. Granted, I made every effort to crush them under my car tires as I possibly could, but our little arrangement held and when spring came they left. Or maybe they died. I don't care which. The point is I solved that problem the best way I know how...by doing nothing. A similar approach worked for me a few months later when I found a bunch of beady-eyed little furry beasts nesting in my grill. Well...truth be told, the wife found them. She was about to light the gas burner and, upon opening the top, discovered the festering rodent pile within. It was, of course, up to me to remedy the situation since I'm the man of the house (nominally, at least) so I did what any man would do in that situation. I poked the nest with a long stick. Getting no response to my prodding, I assumed that the nest's inhabitants had fled the scene due to the commotion following their discovery. I was quite certain, however, that they would soon return so I quickly devised a cunning plan that would force them out for good...a plan so brilliant that it required virtually no effort on my part. I pushed the grill to the center of the deck with the top wide open and then went inside and fixed myself a drink. The cruelty that is a Minnesota spring did the rest of the work as several heavy, wet inches of snow soon fell and, with no roof over their nest, my little BBQ critters found more suitable shelter elsewhere. Or they died. I really couldn't care less. The point is I solved another troubling problem by doing next to nothing. Of course, the next time we wanted to use the grill I needed an anti-contamination suit and seventeen gallons of bleach to clean the damn thing out, but I put that task off for as long as possible. Next came the chipmunks and they weren't quite so easy to deal with. The little beasts were tunneling all over my yard. They were in the garden. They were in the downspouts. They were digging under my driveway, for crying out loud! I tried everything to get rid of them. I filled the holes with dirt and they dug right out again. I filled the holes with water and they just bathed in it. I surrounded their holes with "d-Con Mouse-Prufe II" poison wedges and the little bastards just ate the stuff up like candy and then cruelly mocked me by continuing to exist. I even went the organic route and tried a repellent product that was nothing more than garlic oil and calcium carbonate. I'd have been better off throwing Olive Garden leftovers and crushed Tums around the yard than using that overpriced snake oil. I was at a loss...until I discovered "The Giant Destroyer". This modern marvel combines three of my favorite things: fire, large clouds of toxic smoke and dead rodents. I have crammed one of these babies into every rodent hole I could find and my yard has now been 100% chipmunk free for three full days. I'm now patiently waiting for Sen. Dick Durbin to condemn recent events here at Balsawood as "Auschwitz-style atrocities" and lead the call for my home to be permanently shut down. So yesterday, as I was relaxing on my deck with a fine cigar and feeling quite proud of my ability to keep my home varmint free, I discovered a nest of robins on the joists below my feet. We officially have to move. I will not tolerate avian infestations. The very thought, the very idea...I'll never be comfortable in my home again.
Get Off My Lawn!
The kids are not alright. Not if Pioneer Press music reviewer Ross Raihala can be believed. The rapper 50 Cent performed at Target Center in Minneapolis yesterday. Before the show started, the 8,000 fans (or "worshipers" as Raihala calls them) who showed up were treated to a series of promotional videos. Including..... Most prominent was the trailer for the film "Get Rich or Die Tryin'," a loosely fictionalized take on 50's life - ghetto childhood, drugs, getting shot nine times - that's likely to drive the 30-year-old rapper further into the mainstream. Back in my day, a life of drugs and indiscriminate violence didn't get you driven to the mainstream. It got you driven to federal prison! And we liked it!
Game On
NHL lockout has ended: The NHL and the players' association reached an agreement in principle Wednesday on a new labor deal, ending a lockout that wiped out last season.
The Walk Of Life
Kathy at Cake Eater Chronicles (a MOB member in good standing) is raising money for The Walk To Cure Diabetes. Drop by and drop some ching for a very good cause.
Hop Dreams
Barbara at Quid Nimis is a big fan of the Mexican brew Negra Modelo (I find it drinkable, but not particularly noteworthy). Recently, she found herself in a situation where she was unable to procure said favorite beer. Being in an adventurous mood, she elected to expand her quaffing horizons: While I was in the wilderness NM-wise I decided that it was time to branch out, try new things and perhaps find a serviceable alternative to the Mexican elixir. Over the 4th of July weekend the HEB was completely out of Negra Modelo* and the 4th is one of the few times I actually can be depended upon to drink two beers in one evening (that is, as opposed to one, not 5 or 6), I decided to go with a Sam Adams because it was thematically consistent with the holiday (how very Martha Stewart of me). As it happened, Sam Adams has produced a special edition brew, Cherry Wheat Ale. Normally this would sound truly nauseating but there I was, feeling experimental and patriotic and I bought the stuff. Did she like it? It's in the post. Tuesday, July 12, 2005
Gimme a B, Gimme a L, Gimme an O...
Today's Wall Street Journal has a piece on newspaper reporters and blogging (yes, it's free to all of the unwashed masses) which includes words of wisdom from a local source: Some worry, though, that newspapers put their reputations at risk by letting reporters blog. Jane Kirtley, a professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota, said blogs often are at odds with the traditional role of a reporter. "We expect in the American tradition to maintain this role of detached observer and not cheerleader or insider, and blogs for the most part trade on...the idea of inside information and commentary," she said.
The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Rocket
If I didn't know better I'd guess that our friend John Hinderaker from Power Line was going through some sort of mid-life crisis. First, he went all wobbly on the Kelo decision and espoused viewpoints more corporatista than conservative. Now, he's apparently waxing nostalgic for the misspent days of his radical youth as a long-haired BMOC (big Marxist on campus). At least that's what I take from this comment on Live 8: I don't have any illusions about Africa, nor do I have any illusions about the American and European left. Nevertheless, I think that a congruence of interests could occur that would greatly benefit those African countries that are willing to embrace reform, and also benefit the Western countries that are serious about draining the terrorist swamp. So more debt relief and aid to Africa to fight poverty will help "drain the terrorist swamp"? Okay. Then John must believe that reducing poverty will help reduce terrorism, correct? Less poverty = less terrorism. It then follows that he must also believe that poverty is a cause of terrorism. Hmmm...I think I've heard that before somewhere. Oh yeah, now I remember. Right after 9/11 that was the theory put forward by... ...just about every well-known LEFTIST in the book! In fact, it has almost become Gospel among the self-flagellating, "why do they hate us?" crowd. Getting beyond the obvious fact that most of those connected to terrorist acts (such as 9/11) are not from impoverished backgrounds, it should be apparent by now that what motivates the Al Qaedas of the world is not based on economics. It's not the jing (or lack of) that they're interested in, it's the jihad baby. Back in November 2002, I opined in a post called Viva Jihad that if poverty were truly the cause of terrorism (to say nothing of occupied territories, perceived historical injustices, and overwhelming US commercialism) then one would expect that Mexico would be a seething cauldron of would-be suicide bombers ready to strike a blow against the Grande Satanás. To paraphrase the words of our governor, "Show me the deadly Mexicans. Where are the deadly Mexicans?" Look, I've got nothing against trying to help Africa improve its mostly miserable lot in life. It's obvious that economic stability on the continent is in the interest of the United States. More than that, the people of Africa deserve to have a chance for freedom and prosperity. But I doubt that debt relief and more aid from the G-8 are really going to be all that effective given the track record of previous aid efforts and the make up of most of the governments currently in power in Africa. And I especially doubt whether such actions will have any consequence in the fight against terrorism. For more on Live 8 and aid to Africa, check out Michael Ledeen's prescription for tough love, which includes the astute observation: Capitalism doesn't get rock concerts. As to Mr. Hinderaker, we can only hope that his recent lapses are but symptoms of a passing stage. In the meantime, he might want to look into some other, more productive outlets for his existential despair.
puts you there where things are hollow
Joe Carter has an insightful post on chasing traffic and influence, which offers this well-warranted perspective: According to Sitemeter I've had 654,632 total visits, an average of 1,026 per day for every day that I've been blogging. Compare this to last Sunday night at 10:00 p.m., when the WB network ran a rerun of Charmed and had 1.2 million viewers. Joe also talks about the truly rewarding parts of blogging such as making friends and connections, getting free stuff, and having a chance to share your thoughts with a wider audience, as well as those things that don't quite live up to the hype such as the money, newspaper stories about your blog (tell us about it!), Instalanches, and getting links from other bloggers.
Self-Loathing
In today's St. Paul Pioneer Press, Mark Yost ponders Why they hate us. No, not why Islamists hate Americans. Why Americans hate the media. I'm reminded of why I became a journalist by the horribly slanted reporting coming out of Iraq. Not much has changed since the mid-1980s. Substitute "insurgent" for "Sandinista," "Iraq" for "Soviet Union," "Bush" for "Reagan" and "war on terror" for "Cold War," and the stories need little editing. The U.S. is "bad," our enemies "understandable" if not downright "good." I know the reporting's bad because I know people in Iraq. A Marine colonel buddy just finished a stint overseeing the power grid. When's the last time you read a story about the progress being made on the power grid? Or the new desalination plant that just came on-line, or the school that just opened, or the Iraqi policeman who died doing something heroic? No, to judge by the dispatches, all the Iraqis do is stand outside markets and government buildings waiting to be blown up. Monday, July 11, 2005
Juice Bar Opening In Mpls
So the Twins have aquired ex (judging by his recent numbers) juicer Bret Boone. What's that you say, you don't think he was juiced? If you saw the guy before the 2001 season (19 hr in 2000) and then after (37 hr in 2001) there is no other assesment you can reasonably make. Jose Canseco mentioned him by name in his 'roids book: He hit a double, and when I got out there to second base, I got a good look at Boone," Canseco writes. "I couldn't believe my eyes. He was enormous. " 'Oh, my God,' I said to him. 'What have you been doing?' " 'Shhh,' he said. 'Don't tell anybody.' "Whispers like that were a sign that you were part of the club--the bond of a secret code or handshake. You were united by the shared knowledge and the experience of unlocking so much more of your body's natural potential. Still, though, sometimes you just had to laugh and it was that way with Bret Boone. Sure enough, Bret used his hulking new body to go crazy that season." Boone was an MVP candidate in 2001 with a .331 average, 37 homers and 141 runs batted in--all career highs. Responding to Canseco's version of the incident, Boone said, "I don't know him. He doesn't know me. I don't think I've ever exchanged more than two, three words with him. The whole thing is absolutely ridiculous. End of story. I'm not going to comment beyond that. It's so ridiculous. That incident he writes about in the book is false. The most I've ever said to him is, 'What's up, Jose?'" There is obviously no way to prove it either way, but the circumstantial evidence is strong that he DID juice. And a lot of people around the league say he's a major a-hole to boot. Throw in the fact that he's making $8m this year and I predict the Twins will use him for his last laps this year and then trade or release him in the off season. Minnesotans don't like cheaters. Btw, there are some good before and after pics of suspected roiders (including Boone) here.
Ready, Set, Smear!
From an e-mail from MoveOn.org: Just days after Justice O'Connor's resignation, the fight to protect our rights is in full swing. By all accounts, this will be a long, fierce campaign. The radical right is already pouring millions of dollars in large, secret contributions into the right wing spin machine, determined to ram through whomever Bush puts forward. Ram through? We're talking about a twice-elected president selecting a nominee for the Supreme Court to be confirmed by the Senate which his party controls (again that whole pesky election thing). How dare he! We have a different approach, one that relies on millions of ordinary Americans giving what we can to protect our rights--and this is when you're needed most. If Bush announces an extremist nominee... Whoa, whoa, whoa. Time out here. If Bush announces an extremist nominee? C'mon, why not just be honest here guys and say "When Bush announces an extremist nominee." The chances of MoveOn.org not considering ANY nominee that Bush puts forward "extremist" are about as good as the Twins Jacques Jones getting a clutch hit. To continue: ...we'll to need respond fast [me to agree] and hard with ads on the airwaves and in major newspapers that get our message out--and none of it comes cheap. So today we're launching our Emergency Fund to Protect our Rights with an initial goal of $500,000. If you can help us get there now, we can leap straight into action the moment we hear the news. In other words, we can leap straight into defaming, sliming, and sullying the character of anyone that Bush chooses to nominate. It doesn't matter who that person happens to be either. When Bush names him/her, they will smear. You think the fights over Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas were nasty, disgusting, and bitter battles? You ain't seen nuthin' yet.
All Blogging Is Local
If city/municipal officials are looking for an example of how to use blogging as a means of communicating with their constituents, they should look no further than The Blog From City Hall, run by Scott Neal, the city manager for Eden Prairie, Minnesota. It's updated frequently, is written in a conversational style, is informative (and opinionated at times), and often includes pictures. There's even a thoughtful post on the recent Kelo vs New London decision. It's nice to see a government official who understands how to use the medium.
The Journal Has Landed
On my front step. Thanks to a generous birthday gift from one JB Doubtless, my wife and I are once again enjoying the pleasures of receiving a daily newspaper at our home. And without the usual side effects (shortness of breathe, nausea, vomiting, etc.) that accompany the opening of the pages of the Minneapolis Star Tribune. Yes, the Wall Street Journal is now indeed the paper of record in our household. Beats the hell out of the tube socks JB got me last year. Saturday, July 09, 2005
Second Thoughts on Hinderaker
(Editors note: He's been rolling, feeling, turning, moving, and running. And you know that you can't stop him burning. Now he's back after a long absence to show you the way. Let's have a big round of applause for occasional Fraters contributor Man From Silver Mountain.) John Hinderaker of Power Line fame is usually pretty solid in his analysis, particularly on legal issues. However, his defense of the Supreme Court's controversial decision in the Kelo v. City of New London case is inconsistent with the conservative principles that he usually espouses. Craig Westover has already taken him to task, and I will add my own two cents on what I believe to be an issue of creeping government intrusiveness. Hinderaker begins by framing the debate quite adequately: THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION in Kelo v. City of New London has sparked a great deal of comment, most of it critical. Conservatives, in particular, have denounced Kelo's holding that economic development projects are a "public use" that municipalities and other government units can use eminent domain to carry out. George Will's analysis was representative: The question answered yesterday was: Can government profit by seizing the property of people of modest means and giving it to wealthy people who can pay more taxes than can be extracted from the original owners? The court answered yes. Unfortunately, he then opts for a straw man argument. Many conservatives seemed to enjoy waxing populist over the decision; Pfizer, Inc. was a popular target. Pfizer-bashing started at the top. Justice Thomas, writing in dissent, said that the majority held, "against all common sense, that a costly urban-renewal project whose stated purpose is a vague promise of new jobs and increased tax revenue, but which is also suspiciously agreeable to the Pfizer Corporation, is for a 'public use.'" Justice O'Connor, also dissenting, echoed the theme: ". . . any boon for Pfizer or the plan's developer is difficult to disaggregate from the promised public gains in taxes and jobs." And the Washington Times editorialized: City officials sought to lure Pfizer there to build a $300 million research facility with the understanding that the surrounding parcels of land could be developed into an upscale complex of residences along with a marina, hotel and conference center. . . .The city argues that because Pfizer can pay more taxes, and because it can provide more jobs, it will make better use of the Ft.Trumbull properties than the ordinary people who currently own them. Justices Thomas and O'Connor's comments are hardly Pfizer bashing. Such an accusation against two Supreme Court Justices is spurious. Further, this argument fails to refute the point of Kelo critics: Kelo is ripe for abuse, potentially allowing powerful interests conspiring with local government to take from the less powerful. Hinderaker continues: In fact, however, Pfizer has little or nothing to do with the New London project. In February 1998, Pfizer announced that it would build a global research and development headquarters on a site in New London that was then used as a garbage dump. It was after Pfizer's announcement that the city decided to embark on a redevelopment project that would include land near Pfizer's. Pfizer completed construction of its research and development headquarters four years ago; its project was in no way contingent on the city's separate redevelopment efforts. Pfizer--whose spokesman noted that the company's role in the New London condemnation case has become an "urban legend"--has no involvement in the Kelo case, no interest in the property at issue, and has never supported either side in the controversy. In reality, the New London economic development project is similar to efforts that hundreds of towns and cities have made to revitalize aging or depressed neighborhoods. Focused on a 90-acre area called Fort Trumbull that is comprised of both publicly and privately owned land, the project includes a typical mix of public and private uses: a pedestrian "riverwalk," a waterfront hotel and conference center, marinas for recreational and commercial uses, a new Coast Guard Museum, new residences, and an industrial park to which the city hopes small biotechnology companies will be lured by Pfizer's nearby research facility. The city created the New London Development Corporation ("NLDC") to carry out the Fort Trumbull project, and, as is usual in such cases, gave the NLDC powers of eminent domain to acquire the necessary parcels of land. The NLDC was able to negotiate purchase agreements with most landowners, but a few refused to sell and ultimately commenced the litigation that reached the Supreme Court. The plaintiffs clearly would have their land taken and given to another private party. Whether or not that party is Pfizer is irrelevant. Note that the city wanted to use eminent domain to create an industrial park within an area Hinderocker describes as a "mix of public and private uses . . . to which the city hopes small biotechnology companies will be lured." So the city will take someone's private riverfront property in the hope that they can develop it better than private industry would. Next Hinderaker makes the main point of his argument (emphasis mine): Fort Trumbull is such a typical mixed-use municipal development project that it is a little hard to understand the significance that commentators have given to the Court's decision. The issue before the Court was phrased very broadly by the majority: "We granted certiorari to determine whether a city's decision to take property for the purpose of economic development satisfies the 'public use' requirement of the Fifth Amendment." Thus, if the minority had prevailed, no municipality in America could condemn any property in order to carry out an "economic development" project. This would have the practical effect of making such projects virtually impossible. His last two sentences suggest a collectivist mentality. First of all, I don't buy the argument that such developments would be impossible. Certainly, the larger the scope of the project, the less likely governments would find all parties willing to engage. However, even if Hinderocker is right and all economic development projects became impossible, so what? There is no constitutional right for cities to engage in economic development projects. In fact, such projects are often (some would say always) wasteful uses of public resources. Hinderaker then tries a red herring argument: It is noteworthy, however, that the Supreme Court held long ago that a governmental unit can use its eminent domain power to relieve "urban blight" (see Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26, 1954). That principle was not challenged by any party in the Kelo case or by the Kelo dissenters (with the possible exception of Justice Thomas). So, had the dissenters been in the majority, a city would be powerless to carry out a redevelopment project in a neighborhood that is only depressed--like Fort Trumbull--but if it waited until the neighborhood is actually blighted, a redevelopment project would be permissible. Permissible, but probably too late. It is not obvious how this result would represent an advance for either individual rights or public policy. The suggestion that if the city waited until the area became blighted it could condemn and seize property is indeed true, but once again irrelevant. The area is not blighted and no one claims it is. To suggest that it is on it's way to becoming blighted is a false premise. He next attempts to discredit the argument against seizing private property to transfer to another private entity: MANY CRITICS of the Kelo decision have said that it authorizes seizing the property of one person merely to give it to another. Apart from any misunderstanding of Pfizer's role, this can only be because, once the NLDC acquires title to the Fort Trumbull property, it will be conveyed to a developer, Boston's Corcoran Jennison, to carry out the project. Some hostility to the Kelo decision seems to be based on the belief that Corcoran Jennison may profit from its work--an odd concern, one might have thought, to be expressed by conservatives. But New London's use of a private developer highlights an important point: there is no doubt that the city (or the NLDC) could use its eminent domain power in support of the Fort Trumbull project if it planned to retain ownership of the land and administer the project itself. If the project were publicly owned, no one could question that the associated condemnation proceedings would be in support of a "public use." But are the rights of Americans any less imperiled by condemnation in support of publicly-owned projects? And, as a matter of policy, if a city wants, for example, to create more housing, does it make any sense to force it to pursue the long-discredited practice of building public housing projects, rather than facilitating the use of private capital and private management to achieve the same end? Here I believe he misrepresents conservatives arguments (though maybe not that of some liberals). The proposed transfer of the developed property to new ownership clearly represents taking from one private entity to give to another. It would not matter if the developer were the city itself or a third party. Next, Hindercker presents a hypothetical extension of Kelo: There have, in fact, been development projects in recent years that have strained the Fifth Amendment's "public use" requirement to near, and perhaps beyond, the breaking point. In a number of instances, cities have condemned thriving businesses to clear space for a company to erect its corporate headquarters. Such transactions--very different from anything at issue in Kelo--can perhaps be characterized as seizing property from one individual or business to give it to another. Even here, though, it is possible to sympathize with the affected municipalities. Suppose a large company whose headquarters are located in an urban area needs more space--say, a whole city block. Lacking powers of eminent domain, it has only two choices. It can negotiate with each landowner on the block and try to buy all of the individual parcels. This, however, is often difficult or impossible; once it becomes known that the company is buying land for its corporate headquarters, any individual landowner can block the project by refusing to sell. Occasionally such "holdouts" are motivated by sentimental attachments, but usually they simply want to extort an unreasonable sum from the corporate buyer. (It is interesting that in her Kelo dissent, Justice O'Connor stressed that: "Petitioners are not hold-outs; they do not seek increased compensation. . . ." Yet the majority opinion notes that "[t]en of the parcels [at issue] are occupied by the owner or a family member; the other five are held as investment properties." If petitioners had won their case, the value of those investment properties would have skyrocketed.) Is he saying that a large company has the right to take what does not belong to it, just because it can curry favor with a city council? A company does not have the constitutional right to the perfect corporate headquarters. Further, Hinderaker goes on to suggest that a potential seller of investment property should have less rights than someone who owns for more sentimental reason. Does the law recognize different title of land based on the reason for or length of ownership? I think not. This paragraph displays a scary indifference to property rights. Next, Hinderaker takes the argument to its logical conclusion. Faced with the difficulty of assembling an adequate real estate package at a reasonable cost, our hypothetical company has one obvious alternative: buy a cornfield remote from any city, and erect a "campus" rather than a high-rise building. Rather than accept the loss of a major employer and taxpayer under these circumstances, it is not surprising that some cities have chosen to cooperate in development projects that put the city's eminent domain power at the disposal of a private company. This is exactly the situation that the SC minority feared. A powerful interest wants to use its influence to pressure a city to take and redistribute a private individuals property. The city, afraid of losing tax base tramples the rights of the weak to curry favor with the strong. As an aside, if our hypothetical company is located in an industrial center, the nearest cornfield may be too far anyway. Hinderocker then talks up the success of economic development projects: Today most significant development projects involve multiple uses and cooperation between public and private entities. While such projects can no doubt be subject to various abuses, they can also be enormously successful and of great public benefit--to take just one example, consider the spectacular renovation of Baltimore's inner harbor. Moreover, two factors minimize the danger that economic development projects pose to individual rights. First, they are carried out in the glare of publicity. Nothing in local government attracts more scrutiny or more criticism than such projects. Second, the Fifth Amendment requires that anyone whose property is taken for a public use be fairly compensated, and in practice, most takings are compensated generously. Thus, while condemnation can undoubtedly impose hardship on individuals, it is unlikely to result in gross injustice. The value of such projects is debatable. Hinderaker is correct negative publicity and generous compensation are two factors likely to prevent such takings from being grossly unjust. However, the Kelo ruling makes gross injustice more likely than before. Hinderaker makes some good points in closing on other threats to property rights: The principal threats to property rights lie elsewhere. In particular, regulatory actions often severely limit what an owner can do with his property. Unlike urban development projects, such regulations are often adopted in forums that are remote from, and unresponsive to, the political process. And what an owner generally hopes for in such situations is to be covered by the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of compensation for the loss of use of his property, which is automatic in the case of a condemnation. So it is a good thing that the Kelo decision has focused attention on the erosion of property rights; but, despite the critical consensus that has formed among conservatives, it is far from clear that the case was wrongly decided. However, I suggest that the outrage from both left and right suggests that Kelo was indeed wrongly decided. Friday, July 08, 2005
It's A Major Award!
Don't look now, but none other than our very own Atomizer is being recognized by his peers for his Rock Solid contributions to the blogosphere. (sniff) Our little boy done good. UPDATE: In the spirit of one hand patting the other on the back, I submit the second nomination for the 2005 Rock Solid In The Blogosphere Award: Sisyphus (By Chad The Elder) Sex, sex, sex. It's not easy writing about The OC, Antonia Bernath or fake breasts, especially since these divisive cultural issues elicit strong visceral responses from readers and those with a dog in the fight. But Sisyphus covers these issues with scrupulous fairness, and he always treats some not-so-friendly folks with the utmost respect. His balanced, insightful writing makes him a credit to Nihilist in Golf Pants and the blogosphere at a time when our choice of sleepwear is under attack. Plus, he's always willing to help other bloggers, he's diligent and really knows his stuff. I nominated Sisyphus for Rock Solid over Blogs of Distinction because he's consistently produced good work in the six months he's been blogging. I became particularly impressed with him when he helped bring Nick Coleman, the Strib's top hack columnist who has a history of using libelous slurs in regard to conservative folks, down a peg or two. During a recent drinking bout at Keegan's, I was impressed with the way he dealt with advocates on both sides of the hot-button "Would you have ever done Jeanine Garafalo?" issue. He's very patient. I, on the other hand, let's just say I'm not.
Running The Table & Then Dancing On Top Of It
Last night's festivities at Keegan's lived up to the hype. Much beer and Irish whiskey was consumed, money was raised for Soldiers' Angels, many people signed up to personally adopt a soldier, and of course the All-American trivia quiz was contested. And won by your friendly neighborhood Fraters team. Okay, it wasn't an outright victory, as we ended up in a tie with a mysterious gentleman known only as B.D., but no one bested our score. Actually it would have been impossible to do so. For our score card emerged unblemished after being corrected by the Three more correct answers gave us a total of twenty-eight up and twenty-eight down, an unprecedented event in the annals of Keegan's storied trivia history. Last night, we were the Don Larsons of trivia. Dead solid perfect baby. Back to the main point of the evening. Saint Paul, Atomizer, I all signed on to adopt a solider. The staff of Keegan's Pub is planning on adopting an entire of battalion of soldiers to support and there are rumblings about a similar joint adoption effort by the Northern Alliance of Blogs and the Minnesota Organization of Bloggers. Soldiers' Angels makes it very easy to do and it's a great way to do something constructive for the troops overseas. I think that this presents a perfect opportunity for bloggers to get involved. And so, in a moment of hubris run amok (no doubt inspired in part by last night's trivia performance), I am issuing a challenge to bloggers everywhere to adopt a soldier through Soldiers' Angels. It doesn't matter whether you're part of the Kos Kadre, the Hewitt Horde, or somewhere in between politically speaking. This isn't about politics, it's about patriotism. Real honest to goodness patriotism. The demands of the program are far from onerous. Send a letter or e-mail each week (this regular writing requirement does disqualify JB Doubtless) to your soldier and once a month send a care package of items to brighten their day. That's it. Considering what they're doing for you, it doesn't seem to be too much to ask. And Soldiers' Angels makes it easy for you to sign up. Do it today. After you do so, you'll have earned the right to post this ribbon on your web site: ![]() Drop me an e-mail to let me know when you've signed on with Soldiers' Angels.
No Protesting From The Press Box
The Associated Press reports from Wednesday's protest by that newly outed special interest group, journalists. More than 100 First Amendment advocates and journalists, most from the Star Tribune, attended the noon rally the same day a federal judge ordered reporter Judith Miller jailed for not revealing her sources to a grand jury investigating the leak of a CIA officer's identity. Not a bad turnout. But when management encourages their attendance and it is only a one minute walk from the office, you'd expect a little more solidarity in support of District Prisoner 548872654 (aka Judith Miller). Sure, advocacy of the 1st Amendment is important and everything, but come on, some of these people had noon lunch reservations across town. So who among our local media glitterati was in attendance? The Star Tribune's embedded reporter (who I presume didn't participate, remember, there is no jeering from the press box) identified a single individual: "This could be a very, very dark day in journalism," said Star Tribune managing editor Scott Gillespie, alluding to the contempt-of-court action against Miller and Cooper. The Associated Press article was more generous about naming names. Also manning the battlements were: [Randy] Furst, who has been a general assignment reporter at the paper for 32 years, said he regularly talks to sources who wouldn't give him information if he gave up their identities. "If I divulged that, I wouldn't be able to do reporting in this town. Who was going to trust me?" he said. A good point. Who could possibly trust any media outlet that went around divulging confidential sources? Maybe we should ask Dan Cohen about that. His story (excerpts from the Columbia Journalism Review article on the book THE TAMING OF THE PRESS: COHEN V. COWLES MEDIA COMPANY, by Elliot C. Rothenberg) In 1982, Dan Cohen, an employee of a Minneapolis advertising agency that was working for a Republican gubernatorial candidate, was directed to leak court documents on a Democratic candidate's shoplifting conviction twelve years before. He did so, after being promised solemnly that his identity would be protected. It was not; editors at the Minneapolis Star Tribune and the St. Paul Pioneer Press disclosed his name and The Star Tribune attacked him as a purveyor of dirty tricks. He was fired from his job and The Star Tribune continued to hound him when he found a new position. Even those who may not sympathize with Rothenberg's mildly conservative politics will enjoy seeing the pomposity, hypocrisy, and occasional downright viciousness of the Twin Cities press exposed. Now that sounds like a page turner. Any of the 100 protestors at the court house interested in immediately resigning from the Star Tribune due to its flagrant violation of the sacred press privilege? Anyone? Anyone? Maybe they're participating in another moment of silence. While we wait for the flood of conscientious volunteers, here's commentary another vocal Star Tribune activist: "If we can't keep our promises to protect people's identities, then that information is going to dry up," said Allie Shah, a Star Tribune reporter who helped organize the rally. After the Cohen case, I'm not exactly sure how the Star Tribune has managed to survive for the past 23 years. But maybe lack of good information explains the type of journalism reporters like Allie Shah has been forced to provide us news consumers in the Twin Cities. An excerpt from an interview she did with the University of Iowa: When asked to share a favorite story from her current beat, Shah spoke about reporting a story in the early afternoon at the Minnesota state fair. While looking around, Shah noticed a young couple embracing in the hot dog line. Shah thought they looked perfect for her second assignment, "young love at the fair." Yikes. Talk about a time when we needed a source to dry up. More keen reportorial insticts are shown in this statement regarding the moment of silence engaged in earlier on Wednesday: Many of the Star Tribune reporters said they hadn't seen such broad interest among journalists in a case, noting the silence in newsroom that morning. "It was the quietest I've ever seen this newsroom," Shah said. Yep, moments of silence are funny that way. But, amid all this outrage and protesting for their special interest privileges, it's good to see some of these people haven't lost their senses of humor. Getting journalists involved in the issue won't be easy, said Mark Neuzil, a former reporter who now teaches at the University of St. Thomas. "We're trained to be observers. The standards of neutrality and fairness are drilled into us," Neuzil said, adding that journalists need to change their thinking if they want a federal shield law to become a reality. "You have to get over that. It's kind of like teaching an old dog new tricks," he said. I wouldn't be too worried about that. I think these old dogs know all the tricks already.
There Goes My Hero
Derek from Freedom Dogs longs for the good old days of war propaganda. He has some great examples of comic book heroes doing their part (the one with Superman and Khrushchev is killer) and wonders why we can't see more of the same today. Mary e-mails with a beef: While Luthor Vandross certainly deserves kudos for his life's work, it's shameful that the Star Tribune (via the AP) had so little to say about a truly great American Hero. She's speaking of Admiral James Stockdale, who passed away earlier this week (RIP). Fortunately we don't need to rely on the Strib for an appropriate tribute. Katie from Yucky Salad With Bones recounts her childhood encounter with the real life American hero: He was also a very kind, friendly man who let an obnoxious five-year-old girl climb all over his badly healed leg and didn't scare her half to death with the truth of how it had been broken. You're definitely going to want to read the whole thing.
Walk Away From Trouble When You Can
Crafty Texas Rangers left hander (and former MN Twin) Kenny Rogers released an apology regarding his altercation with some members of the media last week. "I have 17 years in the Major Leagues, with all my experience, regardless of the circumstances, I should have acted professionally and I regret that that was not the case," Rogers said. "I am deeply disappointed and embarrassed with myself for my inability to rise above the situation no matter how it became." Which is all well and fine. Contrition is warranted, especially with possible criminal and civil lawsuits pending. But, call me a sentimentalist, I was hoping someone named Kenny Rogers would resort the Coward of the County defense: I promised you, Dad, not to do the things you done I walk away from trouble when I can. Now please don't think I'm weak, I didn't turn the other cheek, and Papa, I sure hope you understand: Sometimes you gotta fight when you're a man." There ain't a jury in the great state of Texas that would have convicted him after that tear jerking confession. Regading the incident, I saw the entire spectacle dozens of times on video tape via ESPN NEWS channel. The singular joy of that outlet is its willingness to shamelessly exploit on field violence for entertainment purposes. Sure, they act like it's news and that the world is ending by suspending normal programming and bringing in sports sociologists and grief counselors to talk in hushed tones about how awful it is. But all the while, they're running super slow motion replays of every punch thrown and obscenity shouted. It's great. The first time I noticed this tendency was after the basketbrawl in Detroit a few months ago, between the Indiana Pacers and the fans in the stands. Watching it all, over and over and over, I stayed up until about 2 AM morbidly hypnotized by the spectacle before I finally dragged my soul weary bones to bed. I wouldn't have been surprised if by sunrise they had composed theme music and birthed ther own "Nightline" to follow breaking developments in that story. So when I heard last week of an incident with Kenny Rogers, of course I went right to ESPN NEWS. Sure enough, they were dissecting the video frame-by-frame. The Zapruder film didn't get this much scrutiny. And I'll be darned if I didn't see a second Ranger throwing punches from a grassy knoll. My judgement on Kenny's antics, he should not be treating people this way. It's childish, destructive, and ineffective (now I'm sounding like Sean Penn). One of the cameramen involved apparently was hauled out on a stretcher, which is not at all acceptable in a civilized society. Or Texas. But .... seriously, it all appeared very mild, at least by aggravated assault standards. A little pushing, some "in your face" attempts at intimidation, some jostling for the camera. Really, nothing more than what we experience every Thursday night at Keegan's when the owner (Terry Keegan) attempts to get our scorecard away from us before we're done fully exploring our possible answer options. And do we sue? Call the cops? No, we just let it go! Rogers implied he may have a back story with the media that could put his actions in context. I can't believe anything short of preexisting stalking charges against the cameraman would get him off the hook. Or maybe it's something like what allegedly occured in Minnesota last week, surrounding new Timberwolved draft pick Rashad McCants. First, some backstory. McCants has always been somewhat of an enigmatic personality. Has "born to be hated" and "dying to be loved" tatooed on his biceps. Is generally kind of moody and has had trouble adjusting to some coaches and situations. Considering this reputation was earned while he was still a teenager, none of this should be front page news. Grant Wahl of Sports Illustrated interviewed McCants about these issues (and others) last year. It's a good interview, which includes this exchange about previous media coverage and its affect on McCants: SI: Your mother, Brenda, told me the hardest moment for her over the past two years was when a columnist in North Carolina called you "borderline psychotic" on a radio show. What was your take on that? Rashad McCants: I've been called "borderline psychotic." I've been called "bipolar." [Shakes head.] Psychotic? Maybe when I dunk. Bipolar? Never. For anybody out there who reads the newspaper and makes a perception on a couple words they read is amazing. And I think it happens every single day, every minute. But that's life. A restrained, reasonable, mature response. Which stands in stark relief to the rhetoric he was greeted with after his debut before the Minnesota media. This from a Tom Powers column in the Pioneer Press: "Say, Rashad," one of my esteemed colleagues said, "there's something I wanted to ask. Are you bipolar?" McCants' jaw dropped to the lapels of his sky blue suit coat. "Bi polar?" McCants repeated. "I heard you were bipolar." I don't know what Rashad McCants will be like once he starts playing here. But if he ever starts to shove around a member of the media, we'll have to keep that exchange in mind. And then turn immediately to ESPN NEWS. Thursday, July 07, 2005
Tit Tat And All 'Dat
In my opinion, one of the more naďve arguments against "torturing" or in any way mistreating captured Al Qaeda fighters is that it will have repercussions on the way they treat our prisoners. Whenever I hear that particular point tossed out I think, "What, will they be humane and sharpen the blade before they cut off our guys' heads?" Leaving aside the dubious historical record of such tit for tat prisoner treatment, especially in the late 20th century (it didn't seem to work out all that well with the Japanese death marches in WWII, the North Korean brainwashing, the Vietnamese torturing our captured airmen, or the way the Iraqis treated allied POWs in the Gulf War to name a few examples), all one has to do is look to today's news to see what our current enemies attitudes are towards prisoners: A purported Taliban spokesman reiterated a claim Thursday that his group is holding a missing U.S. Navy SEAL and said insurgent leaders had decided to kill him. He offered no proof to back up the claim. "This American will never be forgiven. Definitely he will be killed," Hakimi said. He said the group would release a video after the man's death. As my wife said when she sent me this story, "Do you think they wouldn't be planning to kill this guy if only we hadn't turned up the AC at Gitmo?"
The Best Laid Plans
It looks like Mitch Berg is going to have to find something else to do this weekend. We joke! But if I know the crack Patriot sales staff, they smell a remote broadcast opportunity. That is, if the Whorehouse Days organizers successfully sue the city of Gilbert, MN into giving them the space they need next year. The all powerful City Council of Gilbert has decided to not rent us the public buildings we need for this event. We are tax paying citizens of the community and feel we are being discriminated against. The council rents these buildings to many other groups including groups that are not citizens of Gilbert. We are currently looking for an attorney that is not afraid of (or connected to) the city government of Gilbert. Please call us. Who among the multitude of lawyers in the MOB is willing to stand and fight this injustice? I suspect winning representation may result in being named Grand Marshall of the Whorehouse Days parade. What better résumé item could there be for an attorney?
A Time For Angels
While we know that everyone is caught up with the horrible news coming out of London, we still wanted to take a moment and remind our local readers that there will be a fundraiser for Soldiers' Angels tonight at Keegan's Irish Pub in Minneapolis. Here are the details: Where: Keegan's on Hennepin and University in Minneapolis When: 8pm-??? What: All American Trivia Night and fundraiser for Soldiers' Angels. Reps from SA will be on hand to collect donations and a portion of the night's drink specials will go toward the cause. Thanks for your support. UPDATE: My wife caught this at the Soldiers' Angels web site: Soldiers' Angels currently supports thousands of American Service Members stationed wherever we raise our Country's Flag and the number is growing daily. We also work tirelessly supporting our Wounded Soldiers, with transitional backpacks, personal visits, phone calls, etc. Additionally, we send our thanks via letters and email to the military of Great Britain, Poland and Australia who serve by our soldiers side in Iraq.
Media Distortions
Last night I saw a CNN segment on the contempt NYT's Judith Miller has for our court system and her subsequent jailing. It was hosted by Jeffrey Toobin and featured a panel of experts, including a CNN analyst/barbie doll, Myron Farber - a former New York Times reporter with contempt for the court who looked like he belonged on a box of frozen fish sticks (no photos located online, uncanny approximation here), and from Minneapolis, attorney and blogger ..... John Hindel-rocker. No, that's not some fresh-faced new crusader speaking truth to Power. It is the fresh-faced old crusader speaking truth from Power(line). Toobin just botched his name. At first attempt, he stumbled, stopping at "Hindel.... " then he took another run at it, finishing off with "Hindelrocket." Which makes me wonder if he originally stumbled because he thought the name was Hindelrockem. It's hard to identify the cause of this flub. Maybe the teleprompter malfunctioned, maybe Toobin isn't fluent in Olde Worlde Dutch, or maybe he was intentionally messing with our friend the Rocket Man. That is the way guys hyper conscious of status and fame stick it to you, by pretending they don't know you. Larry King used to do it to Rush Limbaugh during the latter's early radio ascendancy. People would call in to King's show, drop Rush's name, and Larry would reply "never heard of him, next caller, Stu in Cleveland, you're on with Joey Buttafuoco." In a small pond context, I heard Randy Moss do this to KFAN's Dan Barreiro last season. Moss was introduced (to talk about the Lambeau Field mooning, I believe) and he immediately asked "who am I talking to again?" This to a guy who covered the Vikings for Moss's entire tenure via both a newspaper column and radio show. It was beautiful. And something to remember if I ever appear on Tax Payer's League Live! (David Strom who?) In any regard, when asked to speak our man Hinderaker had by far the most salient points and most articulate presentation. He won this battle in the public forum for the continued incarceration of NYT's contemptuous Miller. Although I thought his demand for her to serve her time in the general population at Rikers Island, followed by his promotion of the DVD release of the first 5 seasons of OZ was a little over the top. (Jokes!) One constructive piece of criticism to my good friend and valued colleague at Powerline. When they cut to his video image and introduced him, he had his mouth open. Something I've seen before on his media appearances. Sure, that works fine on radio, but it gives off kind of slack-jawed, mouth-breathing vibe on the boob tube. That tends to argue against his ability to understand, let alone explain the vagaries of complex federal statutory law. Of course, upon his speaking, all doubts were dispelled. But this is a short attention span, channel surfing culture and first impressions can haunt a man for a long time. I suggest something closer to this face and next time he may even get Jeffrey Toobin pronounce his name correctly. Wednesday, July 06, 2005
Stand Up For Your Rights
On this July 6, the self selected guardians of the first amendment have been roused to action, in order to form a more perfect union. More specifically, to secure an even more privileged Guild. Yes the union of professional journalists are demanding to be shielded from even more laws that apply to the average citizen, but not to the class of elites. As you may have heard, it all has to do with a couple of individuals who are refusing to participate in a federal criminal investigation. A serious crime may have been committed, these individuals have been spouting off in public that they may know who the perpetrator is, the court has asked for their information, and they refuse. Now if that were you or me behaving this way, we'd be clasped in leg irons without a care by the journalist community, or perhaps with their applause (at least if they were Fraters Libertas readers). But because they have journalism degrees, enough personal connections to get hired by a monopoly employer, and/or a Clark Kent secret decoder ring, they believe don't have to tell the court system nuthin'. A nice "right" if you can get it. And that's exactly what journalists aim to achieve on the federal level, if they get this perversion of equal protection enacted into law. On the bright side, the professional journalists show as much ability to effectively advocate for this position as they have in advocating political agendas and influencing public opinion of late. Their plan of action: The Newspaper Guild has asked industry workers to pause and stand for two minutes of silence at noon on Wednesday. Which ought to be very impressive to the guys filling up the pop machines and delivering the pad thai noodles they ordered for lunch. But if pausing and standing in silence makes them feel better about themselves, I encourage more of that behavior. Especially the folks on the editorial board. Maybe they should take two hours of silence? Or two days? I suspect most people would suffer from their absence as much as they do from a state government shut down. At the very least we might be saved from things like the institutional voice of the dominant newspaper in the Twin Cities gassily rhapsodizing on the significance of the passing of .... Luther Vandross: He had a way of coaxing the feeling out of a song that would cause a knowing smile or a tear. His rich, sultry voice could take you on the journey through the ups and downs of the heart, yet make you feel wrapped in vocal velvet along the way. Oooh la la. Who knew Jim Boyd was such a sensitive, giving lover? To be fair, standing in silence isn't the only action proposed by the Newspaper Guild. A "vigil" is proposed at court houses around the country. Nearly all of which are completely uninvolved with the court case in question. A protest which, if not effective, is at least consistent in style. On the national Guild web page, there's an example flyer to be used to foment unrest in newsrooms across the country. Composed by none other than home town hero Anders Gyllenhaal: This is a short note to encourage a strong turnout for the vigil to be held tomorrow at the federal courthouse in Minneapolis in support of the two reporters facing jail terms for protecting their sources. A strong turnout encouraged from the big boss? I fully expect to hear of Nick Coleman, Kate Parry, and Jim Boyd standing on the picket line, arm-in-arm, singing "We Shall Overcome." We're reaching a critical time in press freedoms, a point when supporters need to find ways of alerting people to the very real threats this profession is facing. Note, the concern about THEIR rights, not yours. Remember, this is a union we're talking about. The gathering will be at noon Wednesday at the federal courthouse at 300 S. Fourth Street, a minute's walk from the Star Tribune. They're taking it to the streets! As long as it's convenient. We await a full report on this vigil in tomorrow's paper. Until then, we'll amuse ourselves with real stories of American justice in action.
Memories Can't Wait
By now, you've probably read about the plans for The World Trade Center Memorial, especially what might well be called the Hall of Moral Relativism: The World Trade Center Memorial Cultural Complex will be an imposing edifice wedged in the place where the Twin Towers once stood. It will serve as the primary "gateway" to the underground area where the names of the lost are chiseled into concrete. The organizers of its principal tenant, the International Freedom Center (IFC), have stated that they intend to take us on "a journey through the history of freedom"--but do not be fooled into thinking that their idea of freedom is the same as that of those Marines. To the IFC's organizers, it is not only history's triumphs that illuminate, but also its failures. The public will have come to see 9/11 but will be given a high-tech, multimedia tutorial about man's inhumanity to man, from Native American genocide to the lynchings and cross-burnings of the Jim Crow South, from the Third Reich's Final Solution to the Soviet gulags and beyond. This is a history all should know and learn, but dispensing it over the ashes of Ground Zero is like creating a Museum of Tolerance over the sunken graves of the USS Arizona. Fortunately a group has emerged to challenge this paean to political correctness. Take Back The Memorial has a simple mission: Take Back the Memorial is an online voice for all who believe that Ground Zero is no place for politics. Our goal is a fitting and proper memorial to be built for those who perished on September 11th, and to tell the story of that fateful day - and that day alone. They are currently gathering signatures for an e-petition asking that politics be kept out of the 9/11 memorial. So far they have collected over 27,000 signatures. You can add your name here.
Trivia American Style
Just a quick reminder that this Thursday July 7th (tomorrow night) will be All American Trivia Night at Keegan's Irish Pub & Restaurant. All the questions will revolve around the greatest nation on God's green earth, there will be drink specials that honor our country, and rumor has it that pub manager and Thursday night MC Marty "Huey" Newton will be dressed as Uncle Sam. Or was it Betsy Ross? Anyway, I say it's high time that Keegan's gave a little something back to the country. I've had enough of the Euro-centric nature of the Thursday quiz questions. It's not surprising given that Terry Keegan is a noted Francophile, but Marty's arrogant, haute couture attitude and constant Satre references are getting tiresome. When he dismissively referred to us as "bien peasants" last week, it really was the last straw. Of course, the real objective of All American Trivia Night is to raise money for Soldiers' Angels. Reps from the great organization will be on hand to collect donations and a portion of the drink specials will go directly to support the group's efforts to provide aid and comfort to troops overseas. If you can't make it to Keegan's, you can donate directly or adopt a soldier at Soldiers' Angels. Tuesday, July 05, 2005
I caught a little bit of the Hugh Hewitt show today. I say "a little bit" because here at my sprawling estate on the east side of Eagan the AM1280 signal tends to be a bit dicey at times. It's a problem I find quite curious as the transmitter, also located in Eagan, sits mere miles from my kitchen radio.
The first bit I did hear, albeit between incredibly loud bursts of static, was Hugh bemoaning the fact that NASA successfully crashed the Deep Impact probe into comet Tempel 1 over the weekend. Hugh, being a true man of science, fears we may have unleashed upon the universe some nature of imprisoned monster whose new found freedom will allow it to wreak unfettered havoc upon all of creation. I'm sure Hugh would get along famously with Russian astrologer Marina Bai. She has sued NASA claiming the Deep Impact collision has somehow disturbed "the natural balance of forces in the universe" and is actively seeking damages for her "moral sufferings" because the success of the mission threatens to "deform her horoscope". Compared to Hugh, this gal sounds like an astrophysics professor. Later on in the show, Mr. Hewitt broached yet another subject that it seems he is grossly under-equipped to discuss...yes, I mean music. Now, this was well into the third hour, so maybe we can cut him some slack for being tired, but the man actually claimed that Pink Floyd's "Wish You Were Here" was nothing more that a rip-off of CC&R's "Who'll Stop the Rain?". Yeah, that's right...CC&R. Now, leaving aside the absurdity that Floyd looked to John Fogerty and company for inspiration, what I found amusing was that Hugh continued to refer to CC&R for an entire segment with nary a word of correction from Generalissimo Duane and his studio full of lackeys. Does Hugh rule with such an iron fist that his radio companions live in fear that any attempt to correct his errors will be met with fiery rage? Could be. It could also be that they were just as amused as I and simply enjoyed hearing the self described musical genius make a fool of himself. Then I got to thinking...given Hugh's astonishing lack of musical knowledge, what other outrageous comparisons might he be able to create? So, with apologies to the Nihilist crew, I give you: Hugh Hewitt's Top 5 Musical Couplets Peggy Lee's "It's A Good Day" and "Beautiful Day" by U and 2 Megadeth's "Killing Is My Business...and Business is Good" and "Takin' Care of Business" by BT and O Gordon Lightfoot's "Carefree Highway" and "Highway to Hell" by AC and DC Motorhead's "Fight" and "I Can't Fight This Feeling" by RE and O Speedwagon Tool's "Third Eye" and "Suite: Judy Blue Eyes" by Crosby and Stills and Nash and Young Labels: Ralphie
And I Feel Fine
Speaking of ways to pad circulation numbers, what should I find on my front stoop this morning but a copy of today's Minneapolis Star Tribune. A newspaper that I most assuredly do not subscribe to. The newspaper's usual dumping grounds (hotels, nursing homes, and schools) must have been already overflowing with surplus Stribs, so they elected to distribute the excessive waste around to individual households, much like a farmer might spread manure on his fields. But when it comes to the Star Tribune, my particular field is quite barren and rocky and no amount of fertilizer will result in growth (or me renewing my subscription). Today's paper was just the latest reminder that I'm not missing much by not receiving my daily dose of the Strib. Other than aggravation, frustration, and exasperation, which I can well do without. There was one surprising and quite frankly frightening discovery in the pages of the paper though. A Molly Ivins As one who cares a whale of a lot more about personal rights than property rights, let me leap right into the fray over a Supreme Court decision on the side of the property rights advocates, many of whom I normally consider nutballs. But at least they're more in touch with reality than a majority of the Supreme Court. The justice who nailed this one was Sandra Day O'Connor, bless her. She wrote in dissent: "The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms. As for the victims, the government now has license to transfer property from those with fewer resources to those with more. The Founders cannot have intended this perverse result." Hard to argue with that (other than the statement about personal versus property rights). Unless you're a conservative law talking guy. Who would have thought that there would come a day where I'd be siding with Molly Ivins over John Hinderaker? It's a Bizzaro World after all. Monday, July 04, 2005
God Bless America
At about 1:52 EDT, the NASA Deep Impact spacecraft crashed into comet Tempel 1 producing these amazing images. This incredibly successful mission precedes the long awaited return of the Space Shuttle on July 13. More proof that we live in the greatest nation on God's green earth. Glorious Independence Day wishes to all! Saturday, July 02, 2005
Around The World In Just A Few Pages
Every issue of The Economist is a treasure trove of interesting stories from around the world. It's difficult to get through each week's issue and catch all the articles that grab your interest before the next one shows up. Not that I'm complaining mind you. Here are a few examples from the June 23rd edition: The first concerns the Millennium Challenge Corporation, an US aid agency whose methods merit attention: Other donors tend to focus on tear-jerking issues such as AIDS, or on boosting the budgets of the better-run poor-country governments so they can provide better public services. The MCC seeks to promote economic growth in those countries--which is more complicated and takes more time. Promoting economic growth also sounds a bit more conservative than the usual aid language: hence the charge that the MCC is "ideological". But since rapid growth in poor countries has consistently been accompanied by longer, healthier and more comfortable lives for their citizens, it is hardly a foolish aim. The MCC is "uniquely transparent" about how it selects countries that qualify for its cash, according to Steve Radelet and Mvemba Dizolele of the Centre for Global Development, a think-tank. To be considered, a country must be poor: ie, its income per head must be $1,400 or less (though some middle-income countries will be considered next year). It must also meet minimum standards of political and economic freedom (as measured by various independent watchdogs), and it must not be too corrupt. Sounds good, but how does it play out in practice? The land-tenure system in Madagascar, as in most poor countries, is a mess. Few farmers have clear title to "their" land, so they cannot easily sell it or use it as collateral to raise loans to improve their productivity. They tend to use land until it is exhausted and then cut down more of Madagascar's pristine rainforest. The land registry has a backlog of 200,000 claims, which it processes at the rate of 1,000 a year. All records are on paper, stored in mounds on shelves. Both the office's manual typewriters have broken "R" keys--the most common first letter of Malagasy surnames. The MCC is funding an effort to modernise and computerise the system. Property rights as the foundation of economic development? What a novel concept. Perhaps Mr. Geldof should spend some time with the folks at the MCC. Next up is a story about improved relations between America and Vietnam: America has two reasons for cosying up to Mr Phan. The first is economic. Trade rose from $451m in 1995 to $6.4 billion in 2004, boosted by a bilateral trade agreement signed in 2001. This week, Mr Bush pleased his guest by supporting Vietnam's bid to join the World Trade Organisation. Mr Phan also signed agreements on computer technology with Bill Gates and toured Harvard. The other reason is military. A new deal hammered out with Donald Rumsfeld, the secretary of defence, goes well beyond the search for American soldiers still missing in Vietnam. Some Vietnamese officers will now attend senior defence colleges in America for training. Defence officials from each side will meet more often and will work to see where they can co-operate on security. Hmmm...Now why would the United States and Vietnam be discussing closer military ties? The two countries have a common concern: China. The Vietnamese have not forgotten that, after the American withdrawal, it was the Chinese who invaded their homeland. America, for its part, is increasingly suspicious of China's growing military budget. Having more cordial relations with what one Pentagon official described as a "significant and capable" armed force on China's border could be useful. One wonders if perhaps the Pentagon's wish for better relations with Vietnam is part of a policy to "contain" China by working with countries on its periphery. If so, a country that could play a critical role in such a strategy is India (more on that here). Over the years, the relationship between India and the US has had its share of ups and downs. But the good news is that, unlike many other countries, Indians have a very positive about Americans: ![]() Lest you think that the negative feelings from much of the world toward Americans can be blamed on our unilateralist cowboy president consider this: Given the lack of consistent long-term data, it is hard to know how these attitudes compare with, say, the 1960s. But this is the fifth survey of its kind since 2000. For that period, the Pew polls provide strong evidence that anti-Americanism is more than a blip associated with Mr Bush or Iraq. Finally, we are offered yet another reason to pity the poor people of Cuba. Even the simplest pleasures of life, such as a enjoying a mouth watering cubano during lunch, are once again under the iron thumb of the state: FOR a decade or so, scores of privately run stalls have peddled sandwiches, pizzas, sweets, milkshakes and the like outside hospitals, universities and other busy spots in Havana, Cuba's capital. They provided tasty snacks with a smile. This month, Fidel Castro's Communist government closed the stalls down, saying a state body will offer a snack service instead. Customers now expect unappetising bites, served with a scowl. Even regime loyalists grumble about the change. You've heard of the Soup Nazi, but what about the Sandwich Commissar? You enter the lobby of the Department of Lunch Sandwiches (breakfast sandwiches is a different department across the street), take a number, and wait ninety minutes. When your number is finally called, you shuffle to the counter, and a resentful clerk asks for your order. "Um, can a get a cubano with extra mayo and maybe some sprouts and a pickle spear on the side?" The clerk snaps back, "We only have sandwich model C65799 available. If you don't like it, no sandwich for you." Foreign diplomats in Havana say that the crackdown on business is motivated by the official fear that it had become too successful. Cubans were learning what even China has come to realise: that private initiative is far better than the state at providing goods and services. Even in Mr Chávez's Venezuela, which claims to be building "21st-century socialism", armies of street vendors have their place. But, not, it seems in the vision of the future held by Cuba's 78-year-old president. A glorious future in the Cuban workers paradise. Friday, July 01, 2005
It's About More Than Just The Game
It's about the beer too. Check out Beer League. (Warning: includes language not safe for work)
More Than A Magnet On Your Car
Our country will celebrate its Independence Day on Monday. The Fourth of July is a day for Americans to revel in the freedom and liberty that we all hold so dear. It's also an opportunity to recognize and support the men and women of the armed services who help make it possible for us to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Here a couple of simple, yet meaningful ways you can show your support for our troops overseas: 1. This Saturday representatives from Operation Minnesota Nice will be on hand at the White Bear Lake Superstore to collect much needed items that will shipped to troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. You can get an idea of what to donate here. AM 1280 The Patriot will be broadcasting live from WBLSS from 9am until 3pm. That's right, the whole power packed Saturday lineup will be there: David Strom and the Taxpayers League, Dwight Rabuse (in what could be the tearful final episode of "Rabuse on the Right"), and of course the Northern Alliance Radio Network. If you can't make it down to WBLSS on Saturday, you can find other donation locations and information on making cash donations at the Operation Minnesota Nice web site. 2. On Thursday July 7th, the usual trivia competition at Keegan's Irish Pub & Restaurant will have added meaning as reps from Soldiers' Angels will be collecting donations for their very fine cause. The trivia quiz will feature "All-American" questions and there will be drink specials (no, this is not special Terry) with a portion of the proceeds going to Soldiers' Angels. If you can't make it to Keegan's, you can donate directly or adopt a soldier at Soldiers' Angels. Enjoy the holiday weekend. Crack open a few cold ones, throw some meat on the 'que, blow off whatever explosive devices you can get your hands on, and thank God that you're an American. But you should also try to take a few minutes of your time or a few dollars out of your wallet and do something to thank the men and women serving over there who allow us to sleep peaceably in our beds at night.
It Aint Chic To Be A Geek
You know, I love the Claremont Review of books as much as the next knuckle-dragging conservative (thanks for the subscription Elder), but must it be so gill darn academic and obscure? A quick note to the editors: I AM NOT SOME ACADEMIC EGGHEAD! Reading the past few issues I often get the feeling they think I am. Finally polishing off the Spring '05 edition, I came across a piece by Douglas E. Streusand (apparently, like in journalism, there are no "Dougs" "Mikes" or "Daves" in the academic world) called New Totalitarians, a review of a book called "New Political Religions, or an Analysis of Modern Terrorism" by Barry Cooper. Doug makes some interesting points in the piece, namely establishing again that there is a religious element to why the terrorists are terrorists, but loses me with sentences like this: Cooper refers to the European concept of war as Clauswitzian. Cooper's negative evaluation of Clausewitz follows views of Martin van Creveld and John Keegan; unfortunately he has not consulted Michael Handel. Who? Who but a handful of professors (or perhaps Scott Johnson) would be able to get anything out of a sentence like that? The magazine refers to itself as a "Journal of political thought and statesmanship". Okay, but most of the readers of the journal actually have these meddling things called jobs and other time-consuming annoyances like family (not to mention hobbies like casual drinking) that leave little time to go back and read the collected works of some obscure tenured wonks named Clauswitz, van Creveld, Keegan or Handel. So dumb it down Claremont! I don't own a tweed coat with corduroy elbows, a pipe or one of those laser pointy thingies and my office hours are 8-5.
|
TALK O' THE TOWN
Listen to the Northern Alliance Radio Network on Saturdays from 11am 'til 3pm on AM 1280-The Patriot:
|